|
March 28, 2005
Stumped by stubborn Barbarian stubble
I hate to talk about personal issues, but just this once I'll make an exception, and weigh in on the great razor debate now rocking the blogosphere. I'm with Michael Demmons: ....if you use a blade, stick with it. Here’s why. Men, in general, always had smoother skin when they became older because they shaved with a blade. What do you need when you shave with a blade? You need cream. Where does that cream go? On your face, obviously. What’s in the cream? Moisturizers. Since men have largely stopped using blades, they’re now as wrinkled up as old ladies are, when they never were in the old dayes!!I'm not a Metrosexual type, so I'd never buy or use a "moisturizer." But I've used both electric and blade razors, and I prefer the blade. Here's why. Electric razors pull on the stubble, and I have a very heavy beard. In my opinion, the hacking and pulling toughens the stubble, making each stump grow wider over time. Plus, the rotary blades wear out, but very slowly, so you really can't tell exactly when it's time to buy news ones. (They aren't cheap, either!) I also suspect that the constant stress on the little hair stumps cause them to recede underneath the skin, which creates painful ingrown hair infections. Like zits except with a decaying stump festering in the middle. (Yuck!) This condition used to plague me regularly when I used the Norelco, but since I've switched to the blade it hasn't happened at all. As to the blade, I love the Gillette Mach 3 (or the previous Mach 2), with the triple blade. I almost never cut myself shaving because the three blades add the kind of stability you'd never get with a single blade. I admit, the styling of these razors gets a little ridiculous. Almost scifi, like a rocket ship about to blast off. But my view about heavy beards finds confirmation: Tom Nardone:Actually, some people very much enjoy the "forgot to shave" look. Much as I hate to politicize this otherwise non-political post, I should point out that the best way to maintain the Yasser Arafat look is not to use a razor at all, but one of these. I've tried the stubble look, as well as the bearded look, but I'm enough of a barbarian as it is without needing to look like one. UPDATE: More on the Mach 3 Turbo, along with a complaint that it does not, um, vibrate like the power version: And oh how it vibrates. The folks at Gillette truly have taken it to the next level with this little honey. The three blades trim your whiskers as effortlessly as an opposing quarterback slicing and dicing the Vikings secondary, while the vibrating handle creates the sensation of a gentle massage. Shaving really doesn't get much better.Wow. I never thought anyone could actually like shaving. MORE: In the general spirit of this blog, it's probably worth a reminder that the civilized ancients believed in shaving the face -- and more. The Romans also disapproved of pubic hair; young girls began removing it as soon as the first hair appeared. They used tweezers, which they called the "volsella". They also had a kind of depilatory cream, the "philotrum" or "dropax", sometimes made with bryonia, the forerunners of the current depilatory creams. Waxing was also a way of depilating; this was done with resin or pitch. And the practice of pubic hair removal wasn't unique to Rome. It was practiced in even the most remote parts of the empire. Julius Caesar (101-44 BC) writes that, "The Britons shave every part of their body except their head and upper lip." It is reported that Poppaea, wife of the Roman Emperor Nero, used depilatory creams to remove unwanted body hair daily. The latest available creams included some wonderful ingredients, like resin, pitch, white vine or ivy gum extract, ass's fat, she-goat's gall, bat's blood, and powdered viper.I think I'll stick with my Mach 3. posted by Eric on 03.28.05 at 10:10 AM
Comments
I've got an easy solution: Don't shave! I used to love my beard and I'm now growing it back. It's safe, natural, and really sets you apart from the bald-faced crowd. Stop the tyranny of the blade companies! Dennis · March 28, 2005 06:07 PM Gillette mach 3 turbo = end all be all of razors. Must have!!! Harkonnendog · March 28, 2005 06:20 PM I agree with Dennis. I have had a beard for over 20 yrs. Don't miss shaving at all. LYNNDH53 · March 28, 2005 07:23 PM I personally prefer beard to stubble. Sandpaper owww.... B. Durbin · March 29, 2005 12:31 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Female POV on male faces
Blade, please! For all the reasons you list, Eric.
Stubble only "tickles" in play, but once a bit of serious facesucking starts, it can be distracting AND irritating. :-)
A fave childhood memory... sitting in the bathroom watching my dad shave (Gillette safety razor).