|
|
|
March 23, 2005
Are you as shocked as Google?
What if I don't see my favorite news source in Google News? Speaking of Google, and news sites, there's been a lot of controversy about how it is that Google defines or selects news sites. Charles Johnson reported earlier that Google seems to have no problem with Nazi news sites like National Vanguard, while Roger L. Simon no longer accepts Google advertisements. And in addition to the latest in Nazi news, Jeff Jarvis notes that Google reports highly illuminating stories like this: Geologists in the East and West coasts are busy understanding a new theory that shows possible underground UFO bases all around the world....Well, I have found another official Google news site called "Official Wire," which, at first glance appears legit. Until, that is, you notice (sandwiched between obsequious puff pieces about CAIR) the repeated, glowing stories about the exploits of Nazi crackpot Ernst Zundel (partial list shown): CAIR conference to tackle Islamophobia, anti-Americanism [03/22/2005]Etc. I think most will begin to get the picture. "Official Wire" obviously either has a screw loose or else it's some kind of terrorist front. Unfortunately, I could find very little written about this well-funded outfit. While the following website obviously has its own bias, if what they're saying about baou/Official Wire is true, someone really ought to look into this. The JDO Intelligence Division has discovered what in our studied opinion is a Saudi-funded front group that mirrors the sleaziness of the Saudi Royal Family. The Baou Foundation even went as far as procuring women for the Saudis under their subsidiary, now shut down, known as SEX WHEEL. The main propaganda operation, OfficialWire, exists under the guise of a Foundation based in Greece known as the Baou Trust, and in the United States as a bogus charity known as QuakeAid. QuakeAid has been alleged to be involved in fraud, although we see it more a a Saudi money laundering operation, but these people's scuminess knows no limits. CLICK HERE TO READ ABOUT THE TANGLED WEB THAT HAS BEEN WEAVED TO LAUNDER FUNDS FOR WAHABISM AND HAMAS IN THE GUISE OF AN EARTHQUAKE CHARITY, WEB ESCROW FUND, YACHT CLUB, ALBANY RANCH, RESORTS AND ON AND ON IN WINKIPEDIA, A WEBSITE WITH NO CONNECTION TO JDO.The QuakeAid link above goes to this Wikipedia post, with more information about "Official Wire." Google would have us believe its content decisions are not made by human beings, but by unthinking bots incapable of bias. I'm a bit skeptical -- especially in light of the disclaimer of "bias" -- especially considering Google's track record with the Second Amendment. (Nazis yes! Guns no?) And why aren't LGF and InstaPundit considered news sites? Do I have to be a bot in order to feign shock? UPDATE: (One link fixed, and another added above.) My thanks to Glenn Reynolds for linking this post -- and a warm welcome to InstaReaders! Thanks for coming. (And if you're shocked, be sure to contact Google!) MORE: "OfficialWire" is spelled without any spacing, and the Google News link above was revised accordingly. AND MORE: Why isn't Nranews.com considered a news site? LAST MINUTE UPDATE: (03/24/05 -- 3:06 p.m.) I know it's late in the InstaLanche to be raising a serious question, but I have one. What is it that makes the "Moderate Independent" site I discussed above a Google "news site" and not a blog? Is it all just a function of labeling? Or is it based on the failure of the site to use MovableType, Blogger or TypePad? I've seen plenty of blogs with similar-sounding names, and which similarly call themselves "angry moderates." I might be one myself. So what makes "Moderate Independent" a news site which prevents a blog from being one? Right now I am more stumped than shocked. Perhaps I should rebadge this blog as the (ahem) "Classical Values news site." posted by Eric on 03.23.05 at 03:39 PM
Comments
Not surprising that there is selection going on behind the scenes. The site promises that the articles it features are chosen by computer: "Google News is a highly unusual news service in that our results are compiled solely by computer algorithms, without human intervention." Assuming that is true - after limiting the selection - note the bias obvious in the articles which appear on the site. everyman · March 23, 2005 09:03 PM "Assuming that is true - after limiting the selection - note the bias obvious in the articles which appear on the site." Well, you aren't paranoid if everyone really is out to get you. davebo · March 23, 2005 09:13 PM Assuming that it is true, that says a lot about computers. Are they inherently Nazi? or.... veseng · March 23, 2005 09:30 PM Computer algorithms are written by humans. A person can create an algorithm to select any type of story desired. _Jon · March 23, 2005 09:59 PM The UFOs story is hilarious ... It is hard to say what criteria Google News is using to distinguish between "news," "commentary" and "entertainment." The Daily Kos was a news source on Google News until it became apparent that the screen scraper was pulling the "user diaries," which can be very silly and putting them in the database as legitimate news items! It only took a couple of Daily Kos diaries with titles like "Jenna Bush Marries Alien Twins, Moves to Moon" appearing on the front page and people panicked. Kos had the site pulled from Google News and hasn't had it restored. On the other hand, RedState.org, WorldNetDaily and a host of other conservative blogs and news sites appear on there. It would be great to know what Google's policy is exactly regarding this. bink · March 23, 2005 10:12 PM Google may have its PR problems, but Instapundit is no news source, either. Links and "heh" news do not make. As for unfair publishing, how often does Instapundit link to or comment on blogs that are members of the Alliance? He seems to have a jones against them. The Owner's Manual · March 23, 2005 10:55 PM I suspect it's all part of a labyrinthine Peace Treaty worked out between him and Frank J.. And hey, don't look at me; I was an early peace advocate, and I tried to do everything I could to stop the Great Blog War. Eric Scheie · March 23, 2005 11:24 PM According to this article Google is in the process of weeding out hate content. Buster · March 23, 2005 11:54 PM I'm all for free speech, and if Google were content-neutral that would be one thing. But to include Nazis while excluding firearms and LGF, is outrageous. And can anyone define what, precisely, is "hate speech"? Eric Scheie · March 24, 2005 12:02 AM So, here we have InstaSupporters complaining about Google for shutting out the nonnews-source guy who shuts out Alliance bloggers who had to organize in order to get sufficent linkage to rise high enough on Google to get anywhere near the first page of search results. It all fits. The Owner's Manual · March 24, 2005 12:56 AM The Jews control Google; they also control National Vanguard, which is just a front for the Jews in the US District Attorney's offices. And oh yeah - they've bought almost all of the mineral rights in the vicinity of the mantle, and are securing financing to buy the core. Tim · March 24, 2005 08:55 AM Regarding the Alliance, I thought it was pretty clear the whole thing was a joke. But -- I'm afraid I've never been much of a joiner, and it holds me back in the blogosphere and in life. Much easier to pick a side. Eric Scheie · March 24, 2005 02:40 PM BTW, sorry if I assumed you were serious and you weren't. :) Eric Scheie · March 24, 2005 02:46 PM Google's answer is simple: if you're a news site, with reporters and everything, and what you do is post news (like Drudge, the NYT, and the National Vanguard), then you're on their List. But if you're a mere blogger (like Instapundit, Volokh, or Classical Values), then you don't count. Agence France-Presse seems to have its own ideas about who's allowed to read their stuff. Mike · March 24, 2005 05:19 PM Well, that's simple enough. The other two bloggers become "reporters," I become the "Editor in Chief," and the posts become "news analyses." My point is, I see no essential difference between writing and writing. Eric Scheie · March 24, 2005 11:06 PM They consider Landover Baptist to be news.. Personally, I think that takes the cake any day over what y'all are objecting to. MikeF · April 6, 2005 09:39 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• War For Profit
• How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide • I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight • Wind Boom • Isaiah Washington, victim • Hippie Shirts • A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? • Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists • PETA agrees -- with me! • The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's not all that surprising about the UFO story, because according to some, the Nazis escaped underground in UFOs (possibly to the Hollow Earth) after WW2.
So Nazis and Underground UFO bases go hand in hand. At least in crackpot circles.