How big can a word get?

I'm not sure whether this post is about the power of language or the language of power. Maybe it's about the language "infrastructure" itself. (God, another weasel word I hate!)

Anyway, there's an innocuous-sounding word floating around which, because it seems to have taken on emotional (if not quasi-religious) implications, has gained more and more power. It's now reached the point where it's become impossible to ignore.

The word is "watershed." You can now see it appearing on road signs in a variety of places, including the Pennsylvania Turnpike, which lets you know when you're entering and leaving a vast place called the Chesapeake Bay "Watershed":

WatershedSign.jpg

I do not exaggerate when I say the Chesapeake "watershed" is a vast place. All "watersheds" are vast; in fact, the entire world's land mass consists of nothing but "watersheds":

All land is part of the watershed for some creek, stream, river or lake.

Some watersheds are immense; others are quite small. The Chesapeake Bay watershed is an area of 64,000 square miles and includes parts of six states (Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New York) and the entire District of Columbia.

Here's a picture of the "watershed" now trumpeted by taxpayer-funded turnpike signs:

ChesWatershed.jpg

So, a word government bureaucrats would have us regard with quasi-religious reverence actually means, well, drainage. All land is a watershed. So why dress it up with words?

To soften the public up for more government regulations, perhaps? Take a look at these. A wide variety of land use restrictions are being promoted over a gigantic area, even going so far as to regulate how a homeowner might fertilize his lawn. They're talking about draining, all right. Draining the taxpayers.

Interesting discussion here.

I've read innumerable accounts of bureaucratic regulation of land use based upon claims of the existence of various "wetlands" areas, with the constitutional justification for federal restrictions based on Maritime jurisdiction -- the theory being that "wetlands" (even ordinary swamps), constitute a "federally protected waterway."

I'm afraid even to research whether such jurisdiction might be extended from "wetlands" to "watersheds." This EPA-proffered definition is probably typical:

A navigable waterway is typically part of a broader aquatic ecosystem which includes tributaries to that waterway, a groundwater system, adjacent wetlands, and other waters within the watershed that affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the larger system.
I don't like being manipulated by weasel words, and I hate it when they can't be escaped -- especially when they stare me in the face as a sort of challenge. It's tough to ignore a word which clearly means all land everywhere, and strikes me as contrived to create vast power for some.

At the expense of almost everyone?

I think such words suck -- especially when they try to take over the world.

posted by Eric on 02.19.05 at 12:40 PM










Comments

The titles of your posts! "Lower is Sometimes Higher....", "Developing Rock Solid Relationships". "How Big Can a Word Get?".... I know of no other blogger who can equal the style of your titles.

Anyway.... Environmentalism has become just another "big word" for socialism -- government seizing control of private property. Or perhaps more like fascism or National Socialism, since you still nominally hold the deed to your property but the government dictates how it will be used. The Nazis, by the way, as is well known, were "Greens" before the term was invented.

Another beautiful photo, I must add. I love the look of those highways amid those green, rolling hills.


April 2011
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits