|
|
|
October 27, 2004
Is old news a surprise?
As so many are puzzled over why explosives missing in Iraq since April of 2003 would be big news right now, I thought I'd hazard a guess. Because there's most likely going to be a big explosion, not here, but in Iraq. BAGHDAD — Leaders and supporters of the anti-U.S. insurgency say their attacks in recent weeks have a clear objective: The greater the violence, the greater the chances that President Bush will be defeated on Tuesday and the Americans will go home.While that article is talking about the offensive generally, I think there might be something more specific coming -- maybe this weekend. Something big. Something for an American audience. Something maybe like this?
There may be leaked intel, or they may just be hoping..... I'm just speculating, and I hope I'm wrong, naturally. (Others hope I'm right, naturally.) posted by Eric on 10.27.04 at 05:07 AM
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is old news a surprise?:
» On The Missing Explosives from The Moderate Voice
The controversy over the missing explosives continues unabated. To wit: --The New York Times continues to lock horns via new reporting with the White House's explanation of the missing explosive's controversy. --CBS News reportedly had planned to run t... [Read More] Tracked on October 27, 2004 9:52 AM
Comments
Simply put. Eric Scheie · October 27, 2004 7:10 AM What has Kennedy got to do with anything? And what do you call the Bay of Pigs? Or his role in the Vietnam War (he was the first to send military personel)? Kennedy is a hero, like so many heros, because he died young. Dennis · October 27, 2004 9:47 AM Bin Laden is probably dead, either way he is out of the picture (Kerry seems to think that OBL should be the main focus of the WoT) A dictator is gone from Iraq and its people will set the course from their own future (why do people think that changing a country totally around would only take a few months?) Hate-blinded people divided America (Kerry feeds the divide every day) Bush helped stave off a massive recession after the biggest attack on American soil and the bursting of the dot-com bubble (what did Kerry do as a senator during this time?) Bush helped make the Department of Homeland Security, not a good time to reduce the size during a time of war (Kerry is going to ruin our country with socialized medicine, now THAT is big government) The "no coalition" mantra is a farce, who else could even provide troops? (Kerry knows that he can't add anyone either) Bush did a fine job unless you listen to the anti-Bush crowd (Kerry sounds like an anti-Rush where everything the other side does is wrong) What does Kennedy have to do with anything? Simple as that... Guy from Ohio · October 27, 2004 2:09 PM |
|
April 2011
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2011
March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 Sarah Hoyt Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• Why you might get more of what you try to stop
• A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time • People Are Not Rational • No Biorobots For Japan • The Thorium Solution • Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera • Voter Fraud? • This war of attrition is driving me bananas! • Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry? • Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Bush did not get Bin Laden
Bush did not bring freedom and peace to Iraq
Bush did not unite America
Bush did not create new jobs
Bush did not make Government smaller
Bush did not generate any allies: Look at the countries providing troops in Afghanistan (German soldiers die there) and Iraq.
Bush is a failure.
Kennedy was not
simple as that.