|
June 30, 2004
Gracious sakes!
Via Andrew Sullivan, I found quite a book review by Gary Indiana. The following is just an excerpt: [I]t's impossible to actually read this book without missing Clinton, for unlike his predecessor and his successor, the Spook and the Born-Again Cokehead/Booze Hound, he isn't mean-spirited, homophobic, racist, or idiotic, never confuses himself with Jesus Christ, and even when putting annoying people in their place, does it with a light touch. "Unfortunately, my relationship with Bill Bennett didn't fare well after I became President and he began promoting virtue for a living." "Vice-President Dan Quayle said he intended to be the 'pit bull terrier' of the election campaign. When asked about it, I said Quayle's claim would strike terror into the heart of every fire hydrant in America." Clinton is even gracious to Barbara Bush, a vicious old bag in pearl sets who could've given Angela Lansbury notes for her role in The Manchurian Candidate.Yow! I fucked up too, and I have written about it in this blog. It's nice to know how honorable I am. Normally, I hesitate to "parse" the thoughts of other people, but I just can't seem to take "the systemic and implacable evils of maintaining an empire that is inherently vampiric and suicidal" as a "given." Might as well parse out a sentence begining with "given that you are a child-molesting crack addict...." I have never seen so many unsupported ad hominem attacks in a book review. But perhaps he pulled a few punches, for the reviewer didn't accuse Bush of torturing children at parties. ("Gary Indiana", it should be noted, authored the famous fascist-erotic child torture film, Salò.) Plus, he was fair enough to chide Bill Clinton -- if only for being gracious to Barbara Bush, the new queen of evil. Are things getting nasty or what? UPDATE: Mea culpa! As I previously acknowledged in a comment below, I mistakenly identified Gary Indiana as the author of Salo. (Hurried writing is the explanation, but not an excuse. If it matters, I did see Salo years ago and knew it was a Pasolini film.) As the author was kind enough to write to me, I thought this deserved an additional notation, and an apology to Gary Indiana, who is NOT the author of Salo the film, but of this book about the film. The book is titled Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom. Here's his email: > Sweetie, Again, my apologies! I would certainly love to go back to school for a while. But I'm not sure that even that would prevent me from making such factual errors. All I can do is note them as I become aware of them. MORE (10-4-04): Because this post is so old, I have updated the blog with a new post in response to the author's email. posted by Eric on 06.30.04 at 08:42 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1148 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Gracious sakes!:
» Hating hatred from It Can't Rain All The Time...
Back during former President Clinton's second term in office I wrote a short story in which Clinton's scandals led to a cascade of events culminating in several states -- starting with Vermont, then Maine, then California -- s... [Read More] Tracked on July 1, 2004 03:19 PM
Comments
Gary is not the author of Salo. The film is by Passolini based on a novel by Marquis de Sade. He is the author of a critique of the film (this fact is apparent on the first link that you provided.) The "children" in the film are all young adults. And, further, it's not a pro-torture porny film, but an anti-torture "art" film critical of fascist power and critical of the sexual obessiveness of the political Right. (Passolini was a Marxist, BTW. Therefore, of course, he was pure evil.) Interesting remark for someone complaining about ad hominem attacks. Not that there's anything wrong with that! SixFootPole · July 1, 2004 09:14 PM That accurately describes me in many ways. I'm on the Right on most spectrums, and I'm sexually obsessed -- proudly. I've always admired the Marquis de Sade, though I wouldn't necessarily read him too close before dinner. I also admire and identify with Leopold von Sacher-Masoch. He was an Austrian nobleman and was probably on the Right. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato the Elder) the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · July 2, 2004 01:32 AM Thanks for pointing out my error; a good summary is here, Eric Scheie · July 2, 2004 06:37 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Hmmm.... Interesting.... The _style_ of it. Sometimes, occasionally, a writer on the Left does have style. Most interesting that reference to angela Lansbury's role in "The Manchurian Candidate".
Yes, Clinton was a very gracious and likeable fellow, regardless of his policies. He reminds me of a young man I once shared a room with. Likeable and fascinating, also a thief. I liked him even while I never trusted him.
But I must remind you that the Queen of All Evil is Rosemary Esmay.