|
|
|
June 12, 2004
BREAK OUT THE CHAMPAGNE!
Do I hear a drumroll? It's official ribbon-cutting time...... So, a warm, brand new WELCOME to all, here at the newly redesigned Classical Values! I hope everyone likes the blog's new layout and graphics. While I very much liked the old one, it's been a year and I thought it was time for a "facelift." My deepest thanks to Sekimori's brilliant designer Robyn L. Pollman, (whose portfolio can be seen here). Robyn has worked with me for weeks on this, and deserves a medal for putting up with my neurotic demands. Last but not least, I want to thank you, all my readers, for continuing to inspire me to do this. (And Robyn, now it's time for your victory dance!) UPDATE: Out of deference to President Reagan's funeral, I'm post-dating (?) this post to Saturday, June 12. The champagne will have to wait till after the funeral. But remember, life goes on. On a rainy day like this, I wish I could fly to sunny California, of which Ronald Reagan said, If the Pilgrims had landed in California, the East Coast would still be a wilderness. posted by Eric on 06.12.04 at 09:51 AM
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BREAK OUT THE CHAMPAGNE!:
» Spiffy from Banana Oil!
Eric Scheie of Classical Values has just put up his new site design, and we here at Banana Oil approve it. It's both more elegant, and less brown. Though we must agree with the commenter who spotted the removal of "nekkidness" from the painting-... [Read More] Tracked on June 11, 2004 9:08 PM
Comments
Very elegant. I like it. Rue · June 11, 2004 11:26 AM Did you direct Robyn to airbrush the nekkidness from 'Daybreak'? Not very Classical of you, Eric. ;-) Maxfield Parish · June 11, 2004 6:32 PM Good eye! :-) I pitched him several versions of it (after he requested it be used), and ultimately he went with the female-free one. robyn · June 11, 2004 7:39 PM Very, very nice. Solomon · June 11, 2004 9:53 PM Very easy on the eyes, I like it. Now you just need to come up with a new poll. I mean, come on, how long has that favorite scandal bit been up! Actually, I'm just bitter because the ABC Affair wasn't one of the choices, though that wasn't strictly speaking a "scandal." Beck · June 11, 2004 10:26 PM Yes. It does look crisper and cleaner. Other things... I noticed that you have your sidebar and blogroll on the right now, whereas before you had it on the left. My sidebar/blogroll is on the right, too, and I have often contemplated the spectrumological implications of that. I took a look at other blogs on my blogroll to see on which side they had their blogrolls/sidebars. Here's what I found: Rachel Lucas - right Hmmm.... Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · June 11, 2004 11:02 PM Thanks for the comments, and advice! Steven, your analysis fascinates as usual. Not sure if I know left from right anymore! The Parrish ended up just being background instead of theme. If enough people complain, I suppose I could ask Robyn to stick the girls back in, but then what is Antinous doing in the foreground, and why have the colors changed? I didn't want to force a theme on people, and it looked pretty busy, and overly manipulative. It's a design at this point; not a Parrish print. Eric Scheie · June 11, 2004 11:34 PM Gorgeous. Ghost of a flea · June 12, 2004 12:20 PM Very nice. I like the new title area much better than before. Looks much more crisp and professional. Much better than mine, damn it. John Jenkins · June 12, 2004 1:49 PM Looks good! Nice job! Jim Lynch · June 12, 2004 10:11 PM I like that I can now right-click on a lick and choose to open it in a new window. Allan Beatty · June 14, 2004 9:00 PM Excellent redesign. I never cared for the layout or look of old site (though I loved the content). My apologies for not noticing sooner. So many weblogs, so little time. Alan Sullivan · June 23, 2004 7:35 PM |
|
April 2011
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2011
March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 Sarah Hoyt Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• Why you might get more of what you try to stop
• A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time • People Are Not Rational • No Biorobots For Japan • The Thorium Solution • Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera • Voter Fraud? • This war of attrition is driving me bananas! • Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry? • Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Looks good. Crisp, clean.