|
|
|
December 13, 2003
Stop embarrassing and unwanted elections!
I recently took a test which ranked my presidential "preferences" for me in an order other than the order that I would rank them! (Test link via Discount Blogger. ) 1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (100%) That's not the way I would rank those candidates. How dare they rank them for me? I may not agree with Carol Moseley-Braun, but she is at least sane (and therefore outranks Lyndon LaRouche by several percentage points). And I prefer General Clark to Sharpton, Kerry, Edwards, Kucinich, Gephardt. Why does Bush come in ahead of the imaginary Libertarian? And why does Howard Phillips rank so high? Whose opinions are these, anyway? I thought my opinions were mine! What the hell! Maybe I should carefully redo the list to reflect my real order of preferences. But I want to be fair. Who's paying me for endorsements? posted by Eric on 12.13.03 at 09:20 AM
Comments
I read somewhare recently that Carol Moseley-Braun opposed a gun-ban law, supported the right of the people to at least keep, if not bear, arms. I have a much higher opinion of her now, I think. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · February 20, 2004 02:34 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• War For Profit
• How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide • I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight • Wind Boom • Isaiah Washington, victim • Hippie Shirts • A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? • Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists • PETA agrees -- with me! • The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
All I can say is: Screwy. My results were:
1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (100%)
2. Bush, President George W. - Republican (55%)
3. Gephardt, Rep. Dick, MO - Democrat (51%)
4. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (49%)
5. Libertarian Candidate (47%)
6. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (46%)
7. Kucinich, Rep. Dennis, OH - Democrat (42%)
8. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (40%)
9. Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat (38%)
10. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat (33%)
11. Clark, Retired General Wesley K., AR - Democrat (23%)
12. Phillips, Howard - Constitution (21%)
13. Lieberman, Senator Joe, CT - Democrat (17%)
14. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol, IL - Democrat (12%)
Ridiculous. I don't know how I ended up that way. I wouldn't vote for most of these bozos -- ever. I'll vote against Bush if he comes out for that [expletive deleted] Federal Marriage Amendment. Dean is the only Democrat I know of who's not out to take away my gun, so he should be higher on my list. I prefer LaRouche over Sharpton. Philips over Lieberman?? Philips is a Christian Reconstructionist who wants to stone me to death. I suppose it was my positions on terrorism and national security that did it here, I don't know. How Carol Moseley-Braun would help that even 12% I'm at a loss to say. The Libertarian Party is not even a joke. So, yes, I'll go with my ideal theoretical candidate over this jumble.