|
December 06, 2003
Does Phelps really hate fags?
(Or does he just enjoy putting words in God's mouth for effect?) Speaking of satire, I hate to say this, but Fred Phelps's position that a monument condemning Matthew Shepherd to Hell is analogous to the Ten Commandments is a very clever way of mocking the Ten Commandments by satire. Simply put, it's a moral equivalency argument ad absurdum. Phelps is declaring that he knows that God sent Matthew Shepherd to Hell, and his legal position is that this is analogous to the Decalogue (which of course is claimed to be a set of orders from God). The difference is in the numbers: millions believe the Ten Commandments came directly from God, whereas Phelps's adherents number only in the hundreds (if that). As gay activists acknowledge (link via InstaPundit), any success by Phelps will ultimately derail future displays of the Ten Commandments. Calling the monument's message "reprehensible," Lara Schwartz, senior counsel for the gay-rights advocacy group the Human Rights Campaign, said the church nonetheless has a "very good legal argument."Fascinating to see covert alliances in action. And you know, taking the broad general view of things, Phelps's position on gays isn't any different than his position on anyone who disagrees with his "5 Point Calvinist" theology: they're all going to Hell! Anyone preaching otherwise is a Hell-bound false prophet, a messenger of Satan, to whom we say, Anathema Maranatha! and, Let him be accursed of God!I think that's about as inclusive as you can get. Phelps is obviously a very fair man. (And I am sure he's loads of fun to work with!)
I know I am straying from my point, but.... Is Phelps a Satanist? posted by Eric on 12.06.03 at 08:26 PM
Comments
Hey Tim, I did not call him a Calvinist. They are his words, taken from his website. (I all but called him a Satanist.) ;) Eric Scheie · December 7, 2003 08:03 AM ok then :) Tim · December 7, 2003 01:33 PM It looks to me like Phelps is emphasizing the Limited Atonement (that, from before the beginning of creation, God predestined most of the human race to be damned), while Tim, more benignly, is emphasizing the other 4 points. Steven Malcolm Anderson · December 7, 2003 04:01 PM I'm going to have to say that I disagree with Isaac Bonewits regarding Anton La Vey and Right-Wing Satanism. La Vey has long been one of my heroes, like Ayn Rand and Camille Paglia, a philosophical heir to Stirner and Nietzsche. I agree with the values he articulates of pride, power, and mastery. But, then again, in Bonewits's spectrum, I'm a Paleo-Pagan or at least a Meso-Pagan, by definition Rightist on many spectrums. Steven Malcolm Anderson · December 12, 2003 02:56 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Please don't call that... man... a Calvinist.
True Calvinists believe that as deeply as man did fall, Christ voluntarily descended to bring us back to Himself. Grace conquers sin, that's the whole point. Unfortunately it is people like this who have dragged my sect through the mud.