![]() |
|
![]()
June 10, 2006
Fisking the growth of stunt?
Eric Boehlert complains that the Washington Times (in this article) smeared Democrats by claiming that some of them saw the Zarqawi killing as a "stunt": Matt Drudge immediately posted the article up high on his site, while Power Line, Michelle Malkin and legions from the 101st Fighting Keyboarders touted the piece as proof Democrats can't even back Bush, let alone the U.S. military, when a ruthless terrorist is finally knocked out. That's how crazy conspiratorial Democrats are, they think the killing of Zarqawi was a stunt.This led Atrios (in a post titled "Lies and the Lying Liars") to counter the meme, and ratchet things up by accusing "the right" of having a "general love of authoritarian cultists": I do wonder why the right loves Reverend Moon so much.Oh yeah! (I've long been down with Moon's dung-eating dogs. My reasonable side is almost tempted to ask, since when does linking an article indicate love of the author, much less the publisher, but why ask reasonable questions when that mainly bores friends and irritates adversaries?) Whether the Washington Times article was intended as a hit piece or not, I think it's fair to point out that not quite everyone sees the "stunt" allegation as a smear. In a piece headlined "Zarqawi Death Propaganda Victory for Bush," Islam Online cites the Times article with approval (along with quotes from the legendary Robert Fisk): CAIRO — The death of Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi in a US air strike was seen by analysts, Democrats and ordinary Americans as another "mission accomplished" and a golden opportunity for the Bush administration to say once again "ladies and gentlemen we got him" in yet another propaganda victory for President George W. Bush.While Eric Boehlert claims that the only evidence for the stunt claim was "a cut-up quote from a single Democrat," Islam-Online offers more: Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Democrat, said Zarqawi was a small part of "a growing anti-American insurgency" and that it is time to get out.If I didn't know any better, I'd swear the stunt meme was already growing. Maybe not where and in the exact manner it's supposed to grow, but don't blame me. (I never linked the piece until I saw the Atrios tripe about authoritarian Moon love.) What is this Reverend Sun Myung Moonbat trying to do, anyway? Make the Democrats look good? MORE: The Zarqawi stunt meme spreads to Turkey. And Australia. Actually, unless I am reading this wrong, the Democrats right now seem united in making one thing abundantly clear: the Zarqawi killing was NOT A STUNT. I think that's good. posted by Eric on 06.10.06 at 02:24 PM
Comments
Whether the Washington Times article was intended as a hit piece or not, I think it's fair to point out that not quite everyone sees the "stunt" allegation as a smear. In a piece headlined "Zarqawi Death Propaganda Victory for Bush," Islam Online cites the Times article with approval... What's your point? Islam Online and the Washington Times could both have an interest in pretending Dem leaders said the hit was a stunt. Not the same interest: IO wants its readers to think the hit actually was a stunt; and the Times wants its readers to think even Democratic pols are nut jobs. So the fact that two opposed parties promote the same meme lends it no credence at all. The meme is bogus if it's not backed up by evidence. Is it? Well, the Washington Times doesn't offer any, just a "cut-up quote", as you seem to accept. But you think the IO piece does. Well, look closely at the portion you cite: Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Democrat, said Zarqawi was a small part of "a growing anti-American insurgency" and that it is time to get out. Read hastily, that passage looks like an extended quote from Democratic rep Dennis Kucinich. The first two paragraphs actually are. But they don't quote him saying, or even implying, that the hit was a stunt. In fact, these two paragraphs are cut-and-pasted directly out of the Washington Times article. The third paragraph's placement makes it look like its a continuation of Kucinich's quote. But its placement is deceptive: in fact its a separate, unattributed quote. Anyone could have said it. The quote in the fourth paragraph is actually attributed to a "Democrat" in an American Spectator article. I looked up the original article, and the "Democrat" is actually Imagine1989, a poster on Democratic Underground. So what's to be learned from this? The Washington Times remains guilty of smearing Democrats without basis. IslamOnline.net appears to have been even more brazenly disingenuous, though it had a different motive. And no-one has yet discovered a whit of substance behind the bogus meme that Democrats think the Zarqawi killing was a stunt. vakelis · June 11, 2006 01:17 AM Vakelis: You've convinced me. Jon Thompson · June 11, 2006 06:20 AM But, I still don't like Dennis Kucinich. Jon Thompson · June 11, 2006 06:21 AM By citing the Washington Times and Islam-Online, I didn't vouch for the accuracy and reliability of either, nor did I argue that the word "stunt" accurately characterizes views of certain Democrats. I argued: 1. that the stunt meme is spreading; and 2. that it is not fair to characterize people citing the Washington Times as Moon followers or authoritarian cultists. Eric Scheie · June 11, 2006 11:48 AM Let me make one thing perfectly clear! The Democrats didn't say the Zarqawi killing was NOT a stunt; only that they never SAID it was a stunt. Tricky Dick · June 11, 2006 06:56 PM Speaking of Moon what you think about this? Newdle · June 11, 2006 08:32 PM I get a "page cannot be displayed" error code. Eric Scheie · June 11, 2006 11:52 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I have a modest proposal. I enjoy reading not only your posts but also the comments you seem to generate (and how you do that is a question for another day). With that in mind, I'd submit that any future redesign would optimize notification/viewing of new comments. A little column on one side with links to recent comments, that sort of thing.
And, I must say, I've never been impressed with Kucinich. After all, his name rhymes with spinach (no great crime in and of itself), and this seems to amuse him to no end.