|
June 08, 2006
Bad grief?
I see that Nick Berg's father Michael (who is running for Congress) has expressed sadness for Zarqawi's death and blames Bush for the murder of his son: "I don't think that Zarqawi is himself responsible for the killings of hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq," Berg said in a combative television interview with the U.S. Fox News network. "I think George Bush is.I don't mean to belittle anyone who is grieving, but this guy almost cries out for the full Ann Coulter treatment. That doesn't mean I'd say he was glad for his son's death, because no father ever is. But I saw a huge amount of transference and denial during the early AIDS epidemic in the 1980s. I was grieving myself then, and I have never stopped grieving. But grieving is not a license to spout nonsense. Back when most of my friends were dying, lots of people were grieving. I and many others were in the direst, most desperate mental states imaginable. Many became activists, and advanced the seemingly plausible claim that AIDS had been created by government scientists at a laboratory in Fort Detrick, Maryland. It was largely a waste time arguing with them, because this belief was fueled by emotion. (And the need for emotional satisfaction.) I'm sure there are some people who still believe the Fort Detrick claim. [Yes there are. Typical claim here; debunked here.] So I know firsthand how the grieving process can cause people to go through strange and twisted convolutions in their thinking. To the extent that his thoughts are contaminated by misdirected grieving, Michael Berg has my sympathy. That doesn't mean I'd ever consider agreeing with him. (Much less voting for him.) MORE: In the latest story from Yahoo.com, Michael Berg now says Bush is "more of a terrorist than Zarqawi," because Zarqawi looked his son in the eyes when beheading him, while Bush sits in an office: Berg said the blame for most deaths in Iraq should be placed on President Bush, who he said is "more of a terrorist than Zarqawi."By that logic, Bush is more of a terrorist than the 9/11 hijackers themselves. And FDR was a greater terrorist than Reinhard Heydrich. posted by Eric on 06.08.06 at 09:13 AM
Comments
When I read this I can only stare slack-jawed in disbelief. People like this is why I turned my back on the Left. Total moral bankruptcy. Cervus · June 8, 2006 04:33 PM If Michael Berg weren't running for Congress, the best thing would be to ignore him, and chalk it up to "there but for the grace of God go I", because it is hard to judge the effects of grief, as Eric states. But it is unfathomable to me that he is using the murder of his son as a springboard for Congress. I am hoping that his opponent will not permit him to hide behind his grief, while he peeks out to lob grenades like this. pikkumatti · June 8, 2006 05:15 PM Berg, like Cindy Sheehan, more than revels in whatever grief they still feel. Like her, he is using it to keep the cameras on him. Both are whores for publicity. Coulter is more right than wrong in her remarks about the World Trade widows. And they apply to Berg and Sheehan. Jerry Carroll · June 8, 2006 07:35 PM Why kill gays, anyway? If memory serves, gay men in America are the top income bracket (by sex and sexuality), so they pay a lot of taxes. Killing them would be bad for the economy, and the government. Jon Thompson · June 8, 2006 07:39 PM I listened to Berg being interviewed by Michael Medved. I didn't hear any sadness, more of a chip on the shoulder, aggressive, sure in his "moral certitude" who said so many outregeous things I can barely begin. One small exchanges as best as I can recall: MEDVED: Let's say it's 9/12/01 and you could have gotten Bin Laden on the phone. What would you have said? BERG: I would have asked him what he wanted. MEDVED: and what if he said he wanted no more contact, of any kind, between the Islamic world and the West ever again. BERG: I would have given it to him. Darleen · June 8, 2006 09:13 PM Hello all...... Anna · June 14, 2006 09:42 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The real shame of it is that there are political opportunists who will support him in his delusions because his status as a grieving father gives him some novelty and a shadowy 'expert' status, which is the staple of much irrational debate.