Secret campaign courts secret voters behind the scenes . . .

I just found out that there's apparently a ban on campaign reporting going on in New York, and the whole thing is barely mentioned in the MSM:

The Clinton campaign ban on any mention of Hillary's likely challenger, John Spencer, slipped a bit last night on Hardball.

WOLFSON: We have an opponent. John Spencer, the former mayor of Yonkers, is running against her.

MATTHEWS: Careful, it`s going to be a rough ride for you guys.

This is about the most daylight Spencer's campaign has gotten yet. Oh, aside from accusing an Iranian exile of dispensing Mullah Moolah, which got him linked on the Drudge Report.

Intriguing, but is it true?

Sure enough, I found confirmation at NewsBusters, which claims there's a near-total blackout on Spencer and his campaign:

The New York Times published an article on Tuesday concerning an annual Conservative Party conference held in Albany, New York, on Monday. Reporter Jennifer Medina addressed issues raised by some of that state’s Republican candidates for governor and attorney general. Yet, Medina and the Times chose not to report in its print editions statements made at this meeting by John Spencer, the likely Republican candidate to oppose Hillary Clinton (D-NY) for senator this November.

At about 1PM EST on Monday, the Associated Press ran an article (hat tip to Drudge Report) about Spencer’s comments at this conference with the headline “Spencer: Clinton aids and abets our enemies.” According to the article, Spencer said “the New York Democrat's criticism of the Bush administration ‘aids and abets our enemies’ in the battle against terrorism.” Yet, for some reason, the Times chose not to report this part of the meeting to its readers, and didn't address Spencer's attendance at this conference at all.

A LexisNexis search identified few media outlets that covered this report. In New York, Newsday placed a 251-word watered-down version of this AP story on page A17. That was better than the Daily News who, like the Times, didn’t report this at all. Why should they, as Spencer had some strong language for Hillary and her husband:

"‘I wish we had [the Patriot Act] before 9-11,’ said the former mayor of Yonkers. ‘And, I wish we had an administration in Washington that wasn't an appeasing, liberal, whining administration in the 90's that allowed the terrorists to build up the way they built up.’"

Also according to LexisNexis, neither CNN nor any of the broadcast networks have reported this with the possible exception of their websites.

On top of that, Newsmax reports that Karl Rove is helping John Spencer in his campaign.

I think Rove likes being ignored, and ignoring Rove has always worked before, hasn't it?

Personally, I hope they continue the non-reporting. Sounds like a good strategy.

posted by Eric on 02.15.06 at 05:30 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/3323






Comments

When MzBill opens her Third Eye, and beams satori upon the hapless Pinch et.al., there is nothing left but Nothing to report.

Mde the Hill incarnates not Vishnu but the Venus of Willendorf: Virtually no head; huge, pendulous bosoms enfolding fertility-enhancing rolls of Paleolithic mammoth-fat. Not a physical incarnation, mind you, but "of the mind" (such as it is). Her shrikish leftism, lactating Statism, collectivist ovulations promising a New Birth of Stupid-- are these not of a piece with Defecrat mewlings these last seventy-five years?

Willendorf for MzBill! Now there's a rallying call for Ed Koch's "Apple Knockers." You go, girl!-- better yet, just GO.

John Blake   ·  February 15, 2006 08:40 PM

Why should the MSM go out of their way to report a bunch of stale, cowardly, unmanly, totally unoriginal "everyone I don't like is a commie terrorist" drivel? There is, quite literally, no substance at all in the accusations you quote here, nothing to separate it from every other puff of Republican brown air.

PS: John Blake needs to get back on his meds, but his obsession with female form and bodily functions do serve as a helpful reminder of most rabid Clintonphobes' mental and spiritual condition. (I'm surprised he didn't mention any of those old allegations about Hillary's sex life...)

Raging Bee   ·  February 16, 2006 09:15 AM

Stop! Stop! You're making me feel nostalgic for "old allegations". Also I must defend the right of all commenters not to be medicated!

No exceptions!

Eric Scheie   ·  February 16, 2006 10:47 AM

As a Spencer supporter and donor, a lot of the lack of reporting has to do with the NY GOP as much as anything else. They have not gotten behind Spencer, and every week or so there is a rumor of another candidate. Until the GOP gets it's act together, the press stays away.

Once the NY GOP accepts that Spencer is the candidate, he'll start getting more coverage. For now, he's going around New York shoring up the GOP and Conservative base. He's a great speaker: kind, thoughtful and eloquent, even if he comes off as "rough and tumble" in these few national stories.

The liberals in New York underestimate Spencer, but he's already raised almost twice as much money as Howard Mills, the GOP's candidate in 2004 against Chuck Schumer. And we're still 8 months away from the election.

Keep an eye out.

Sean   ·  February 17, 2006 02:06 PM


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits