|
January 26, 2006
Weathering the news
Increasingly, there seem to be two different "news worlds" for lack of a better term. There's online news, and "regular" news. Right there I'm realizing that I'm running out of terms, and resorting to improvising on-the-spot euphemisms of my own. What, in the name of God, is "regular" news? The stuff that manages to find its way past whatever editorial board runs the New York Times, the news that makes it onto major network television, or the news that makes it into the hard copy of my daily, the Philadelphia Inquirer? I don't know what regular news is. For that matter, I don't know what "real" news is. If it doesn't get widely reported, is it news? If it gets reported, but barely, then is its relative importance to be determined by that? I'll illustrate with a few recent examples. While I would have thought a major change in government in the country to the immediate north of the United States would have been considered of the utmost importance, the news of the Canadian election results was buried in the interior pages of the Philadelphia Inquirer. Yet today's Inquirer deems Palestinian Authority exit polls (not even tangible election results) worthy of today's front page. Why? The huge story of Google censorship is buried in the last paragraph of another article with a different headline on page eight -- this despite the fact that a congressman from New Jersey (that's the area of the Inquirer's distribution) is holding hearings on the matter. The Google story is of course huge news on the Internet and everywhere in the blogosphere. But perhaps I'm overreacting. Perhaps what's big news on the Internet is not news in Philadelphia. Then there's another story I've touched on before which is huge news on talk radio, and which would be newsworthy if it happened in any other country, and that is the regular cross border incursions (I won't yet call this an invasion) of Mexican troops into the United States. Just yesterday, another incursion was reported: Chief Deputy Mike Doyal of the Hudspeth County Sheriff's Department said that Mexican army personnel had several mounted machine guns on the ground more than 200 yards inside the U.S. border, the Daily Bulletin newspaper reported earlier. Whether it should be called an invasion or not, I think this is major news, and the fact that it isn't being reported makes me wonder whether there isn't a serious attempt to relegate any serious discussion of it to paranoid conspiracy status. (Something often triggered precisely because of non-reporting!) This all begs the question of what is news. Don't ask me. It's freezing cold outside, and I was earlier told it was a "nice day." Relative to Russia, I suppose it is. Weather is a relative thing -- something that I, a weather absolutist who believes weather is either good or evil, must admit. If the truth were told, news would probably be as relative as the weather. (I said "if" the truth were told....) posted by Eric on 01.26.06 at 07:06 AM
Comments
It is being reported, but in an awfully funny way.
We're so eager not to cause a problem with Mexico, that we won't even say "Mexican military." We say, "Men in Mexican military-style uniforms." This, even though the Department of Homeland Security says that they WERE Mexican military. Bonnie · January 26, 2006 03:32 PM Well, they are either Mexican military or they are not. If, as the Mexican government maintains, they are not, then they are simply very dangerous armed criminals -- who should be met with force. Eric Scheie · January 26, 2006 03:43 PM Thanks for the link, Bird Dog! Eric Scheie · January 26, 2006 03:44 PM Ooops.. that Department of Homeland Security link should really be linking here. Bonnie · January 28, 2006 10:38 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Good piece. Classic Eric. We just linked it, above a piece on the NYT.