|
November 03, 2005
citizenship: n. a door prize
The new UK citizenship test is now being bandied about in the culture war across the pond: Being British is not about whether you know the lyrics to God Save the Queen or can order tea in a cool accent. No one's going to argue that citizens should have no familiarity with emergency services, but an 18 question trivia quiz does not a citizen make. The man who got the last word used it well: "History binds us together, but, of course, history can also divide," says Lawrence Goldman, editor of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, who says new immigrants should know the basics. "There are some key moments, key figures, key experiences that bring this nation together — the first two World Wars, for example." I have no doubt that this sort of thing grows out of historicism and relativism, two pernicious -isms which ultimately make people not only devalue their own culture and history but feel ashamed of it. There is apparently a kind of chauvinism in valuing the West's traditions of inclusiveness, openness, and rational inquiry. By encouraging immigrants to adopt these very virtues we are apparently attacking the dignity of the cultures they might lose in the process. To demand that an immigrant study and understand the society which he wishes to join is mutually beneficial. You're a fool if you fail to acknowledge that. At least here in the States we still get it. Anyone interested in playing the American version, or at least a quick, online quiz modeled somewhat on the U.S. citizenship test, here you go:
posted by Dennis on 11.03.05 at 12:08 PM
Comments
By the way, 10 out of 10. American. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · November 3, 2005 01:44 PM In light of my last post, yours cheered me immensely. (Perhaps I should advocate deporting all who fail the test....) Eric Scheie · November 3, 2005 01:47 PM 9 out of 10, but I don't know which one I missed. I expect it was either the main author of the Declaration of Independence (Jefferson, but unsure) or the year the Constitution was written (1786, but I wasn't sure it wasn't 1787.) Sigivald · November 3, 2005 05:30 PM 10/10. Aristomedes · November 3, 2005 05:53 PM 1787. So you know. B. Durbin · November 3, 2005 09:50 PM US Citizen 10/10 Ted · November 3, 2005 10:26 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"Being British is not about whether you know the lyrics to God Save the Queen or can order tea in a cool accent.
It's not about your familiarity with Shakespeare, your knowledge of the Restoration or your command of the battles that forged the empire."
As far as I'm concerned, yes, it indeed does mean those things. A nation is its history, its heritage. It's not about voltage and lottery tickets but about Shakespeare and the Heptarchy, George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, Charles Martel and Jeanne d'Arc. I am Conservative.
Right now, I'm in the process of going over a bunch of old John Birch Society booklets. Extremely informative regarding the machinations of the Communist Conspiracy. The style.