|
July 29, 2005
QUOTE OF THE DAY
Samizdata's Guy Herbert made such a brilliant remark that (despite the fact that I'm out for dinner and shouldn't even be using this computer right now) I can't resist sharing it. Otherwise I might forget. It's about freedom versus so-called "rights." Freedom has no natural place in a "hierarchy of rights". Freedom used to be what was left over when other people's rights to their choices were taken into account. But the priesthood seems keen to ensure that there are "rights" everywhere, with no space for anything else, and that "rights" are not options, they are compulsions. Lenin would be proud.Yes he would. I'm not saying there aren't such things as rights. (After all, this country was founded on the Bill of Rights.) But we should be proud of freedom, and stop fetishizing newly invented "rights" which seem more and more antithetical to freedom. posted by Eric on 07.29.05 at 06:41 PM
Comments
If you really want the children to grasp "the entire premise" behind the constitution, then you're going to have to instruct them that it is morally righteous to claim and bind other peoples' lives centuries in advance of their births. Do you understand the implications? I don't believe that you want to go anywhere near something like that. That's probably somewhere in the ballpark with the very last thing you want. Billy Beck · July 29, 2005 11:45 PM Rights, in our Constitutional concept, are what the government cannot do to you (e.g., tske away your home) -- not what government should do for you (e.g., provide you with a home). In other words, the sole legitimate function of government is to protect the life, liberty, and property of the individual, and, by extension, the military security of the nation, and then to leave us the Hell alone. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · July 30, 2005 01:36 AM Steven, you're right about the original idea of rights. The idea that someone has a right to your money is a perversion of the idea of rights. That's also a good point about binding future generations -- something Jefferson worried about ("life belongs in usufruct to the living" etc.) Eric Scheie · July 30, 2005 07:57 AM Dear Eric: Thank you! (again....) As to the older generation binding another, I'm inclind to agree with Edmund Burke when he spoke of a compact between the dead, the living, and those yet unborn. That's what we write wills for, to bind those living after we ourselves are long dead, have long passed into the other world. By the way, speaking of wills, Ayn Rand explicitly left her Estate to, and designated Leonard Peikoff as, her heir. I can't wait till I get my hands on that book. I'm getting more conservative every day. We need another General Horemheb. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · July 30, 2005 01:50 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
What we really need to do, and I admit I know not how, is to make sure that no child graduates from high school without understanding the entire premise behind the Bill of Rights, Constitution, and Declaration of Independence:
We The People already possess all of the rights that could ever exist. Our founding charters are a delineation of the strictly limited power We The People have granted to the Federal and State governments to abrograte those rights in narrowly defined circumstances.
Those idiots who believe that government grants us our rights deserve what they get.