|
June 25, 2005
Toyotas kill children! Something must be done!
Three missing boys who prompted a massive, two day manhunt (which included checking sexual offender registries) have been found -- in the trunk of a car right where they'd last been seen playing: ....it ended abruptly around 7 p.m., when David Agosto opened the door of a maroon Toyota Camry parked inside Cruz's yard and popped the trunk as TV cameras recorded the event. Apparently, police searched the car and numerous houses in the area, but it just never occurred to them to search the trunk Many questioned whether the search was thorough and why the trunk had not been opened.Imagine that! The neighbor saw them playing with the very car they were found in. You know, were I allowed to play Sherlock Holmes, that car might have been a very logical place to start the search. And the search might very well have included opening the trunk. But never mind that! We are now told the car was at fault -- for being "an older model, not equipped with a release button that the boys could have used to free themselves once inside the trunk." Good work men! The only thing to do now is to draft appropriate legislation making it a crime to have older cars with trunks that can't be opened! Children might manage to get inside and lock themselves in. Certainly it isn't the fault of police for not looking. (And we can't expect parents to search their own cars, can we?) I have no idea why, but the New York Times is a bit harder on Chief Figueroa: It was also not clear why the 150 police officers who had been searching rivers, drainpipes and tick-infested woods for the last two days had not searched the trunk of a car parked in the yard of the home where the boys disappeared.Whoa. Bloodhounds? Sexual offender registries? The cops did absolutely everything they possibly could, didn't they? While I think the bloodhounds (who have some brains and should know better) can be faulted for not finding the boys, the evil Toyota Corporation is the primary culprit! Toyota built that unsafe car trunk! Toyota failed to send out notices to every owner that even in the event of a massive search, it might not occur to police to open the unsafe car trunks to find children last seen playing with the car. The buck has to stop somewhere. MORE: It's theoretically possible that I was too hard on the cops involved, and I note that an autopsy is being performed, but the results aren't in. It might yet turn out that the boys were murdered and then placed in the trunk after the police searched it. (It would renew my faith a little.) AND MORE: According to a more recent story, police are more and more sure they did search the trunk: The parents of the three Camden boys and investigators are now haunted by the same impossible question: were they there the whole time?And they focused on the possibility that the boys were murdered and placed in the trunk afterward. "It is weird. I think it had to have been someone else," said Sarah Rivera, a family friend who joined more than a dozen devastated family members outside of Camden Police Headquarters last night.I'm thinking they already know, but are keeping mum. (Might be either to avoid spooking the murderer, or to buy time for "damage control.") UPDATE (12:22 p.m.): CASE CLOSED! Autopsy: Boys died from accidental suffocationToyota better get ready for the inevitable lawsuits. AND EXCUSE ME for asking, but why is this Philadelphia-area news coming out of Cleveland? MORE: The Philadelphia Inquirer now has a writeup on the autopsy. (Don't know why the Cleveland story was the first to make it onto Google.) AFTERTHOUGHT: I hope readers will remember that my mind was on pit bulls as I focused on the stupidity above. In these cases, feelings trump logic, and even facts. (Related thoughts here.) AND EVEN MORE (06/25/05, 10:15 p.m.): This is going to sound even stranger, but I just heard a reporter on Philadelphia's KYW News Radio (1060 AM) state that the mystery is deepening, as apparently the police now insist that they did search the trunk, and it was empty. I thought this over, and my initial reaction was that the police were lying in a bad attempt to cover up their negligence. But that really doesn't make sense, because unless they're absolute idiots, cops are well aware of the problems posed by bad coverups. The more I thought about it, the less sense it made. Surely no one could have killed the kids and put them in there, with the autopsy showing no foul play.... Then suddenly, it occurred to me that there is a reasonable explanation consistent with the police story. The kids were playing hide and seek somewhere else (they'd most likely been doing something they shouldn't have), then once they started back and saw what a fuss the grownups were making with the cops, they realized they'd be in huge trouble, so they took their first opportunity to hide, without thinking it through. This would explain how they could have hidden inside the trunk, but after it had already been searched. If you think about it, guilt would supply a kid with a motive to do something exactly like that. Simply going into a trunk doesn't make much sense, especially for an 11-year-old, unless there's a reason. Hiding in the trunk is stupid and childish, but hell, these were kids. If the cops are telling the truth, that's my theory. (Toyota's liability is unchanged.) MORE: And now it's back to an admission they didn't search the trunk, along with the announcement of a bureaucratic investigation: Police officials began an investigation into why none of the 150 officers assigned to the search checked the trunk of the car, a battered Toyota Camry parked just feet from where the boys were last seen Wednesday evening.150 officers? And not one of them searched the trunk? The family would have done better to hire a private detective! MORE: A forensic expert from New York confirms that the boys only had around three hours of air. Considering that the disappearance was at 5:00 p.m., and parents didn't call the police until after 8:00 p.m., any negligence by police may have been moot. Notwithstanding my amazement that it never occurred to a single one of the 150 officers to pop the trunk, I'm inclined to agree with commenter Persnickety below that if anyone is primarily to blame, it's the parents. In lawyer language, of course, it'll be Toyota. LAST (AND I HOPE LAST) UPDATE (07/01/05): An attorney for the family of one of the boys is looking into liability issues: Authorities said that the deaths were accidental, and that the children apparently had climbed into the trunk while playing.I hate to sound cynical, but once the grieving ends, such decisions are usually influenced by money. posted by Eric on 06.25.05 at 07:27 AM
Comments
Well, that's the theory police are now pursuing. I'd say the autopsy would most likely be dispositive. Eric Scheie · June 25, 2005 12:06 PM I'm still skeptical about the murder theory, though. How would the murderer manage to first snatch away all three lively boys -- in a dense urban neighborhood at dinnertime -- then later enter the yard despite a manhunt (and resultant heightened awareness by family and neighbors), and stuff the dead kids in the trunk? It's possible, but forgetting to search the trunk strikes me as likelier. Eric Scheie · June 25, 2005 12:19 PM Don't know about this case. All I know is that this reminds me of a Jack T. Chick tract I read recently in which a kidnapper locked a little girl in the trunk of his car and drove off with her in order to sell her into slavey to degenerates in Mexico. She prayed to Jesus (the Christ), who instructed her to bang on the lid. A Christian policeman heard her, rescued her, and arrested the criminal. The policeman remarked: "We have an awesome God." The style of that. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · June 26, 2005 08:38 AM At the risk of the entire world knowing just what a cold-hearted bitch I am: I'd just like to point out that the parents didn't search the trunk either. & I would presume they glanced around a tad before they called the police. Sorry, if I was a policeman looking for kids, I wouldn't much bother looking on the child's property, in obvious child places like under the bed, in the closet, and in an abandoned car actually on the property. If we must go on a blame-hunt, the parents get the first and biggest share. Persnickety · June 27, 2005 08:59 PM and to one-up Persnickety - one of the boys had 9 siblings, another of the boys had 5. Some of the choices folks make, such as to divide their possible attention by 10, do have an impact...... big boi · June 28, 2005 05:32 PM I don't think Toyota or the Camden Police were supposed to be watching the children. And if the trunk was so obvious to everyone, why didn't the parents who had the keys search it, knowing that one of the boys had previously played in the car? Anonymous · July 6, 2005 06:37 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
There are three oddities about the case that make me think the boys were put in the trunk later.
1) According to the article in the NY Post, the bloodhounds were involved in the car search. Despite the fact that the kids' scent would have been everywhere around and in the car, I can't believe they didn't pause over the trunk.
2) Car trunks, unlike old refrigerators, tend not to have airtight seals--the kids would have been alive for a long time and would almost certainly have been making noise if they were merely trapped.
3) How big was this trunk that they could all fit inside and yet still be able to pull it closed with enough force to fully latch it?
While I can't think of a motive to put the kids in the trunk in the middle of a massive search, I'll still be surprised if that's not what happened.