|
April 08, 2005
Tooth or consequences . . .
If you've been worried about the Loch Ness Monster, there's reason to worry some more. An man describing himself as a college student from the Midwest claims he has solved the puzzle. "Nessie," it turns out, is no water-bound plesiosaur, but an amphibian creature that comes ashore to prey on deer! During a trip to the Loch Ness area, the student claims he discovered a mutilated deer carcass with a tooth embedded in one of its ribs. He pried out the tooth, only to have it confiscated by a "water bailiff" who (for some sinister reason or another) now refuses to give it back. So now he has posted a $5000.00 reward: I’m a college student in the Midwest U.S. In March (2005) my roommate and I went to the U.K and spent our last two days at Loch Ness. The boat rental season hadn’t started so we hired a local who took us on a private boat tour.And here's a picture of the tooth: The problem I have is that morphologically, it doesn't look like a tooth -- of an amphibian or anything else. It looks like one pincer from a crab claw! Notice that there are several little points, and they're perpendicular to the shaft. One downward bite, and they'd break off. It makes sense for a grasping pincer, but not for a tooth. Snakes' teeth curve backwards, but they aren't very long and they're only meant for holding the prey while swallowing. This tooth is too long (and too inflexible) for that. And how on earth would it become embedded in a deer? Is this really a tooth? The whole tooth? I don't know whether to bite on the story, but I'm hedging my bets. If anyone can identify the specimen above or shed further light on the story, go right ahead! MORE: If the story is true, it appears that the "water bailiff" may have exceeded his statutory authority. posted by Eric on 04.08.05 at 03:21 PM
Comments
You may be right. I looked for matching crab claws as well as animal horns, but I couldn't find any. If you do locate a match, let me know. I don't think it's a tooth. Eric Scheie · April 11, 2005 10:54 AM Maybe someone who knows UK deer well could clarify whether or not I'm full of it, but I'll be damned if that doesn't look like a muntjac antler. Says they're extremely rare in Scotland though... Check out the tusks on this beauty. Still, that doesn't look like a tooth of any sort. Nathan · April 11, 2005 12:53 PM It could be an antler of a small roe deer (native to Scotland). Greg Inskip · April 11, 2005 04:58 PM Thanks! But it doesn't look to me like the antlers in the pictures of the Roe deer..... Eric Scheie · April 11, 2005 07:08 PM I vote for the Muntjac. The description of how the antlers develop matches what's in his palm. Scott Rassbach · April 12, 2005 01:52 PM Naw.. definitely not an antler. antlers are boney structures that get larger as they grow. the pointed barbs on the "inside" edge of this object are indicitive that what we are looking at is a completely formed "part" the coloration also does not appear to be that of a boney component. There is no evidence of liquid blood at the "root," what appear to be red stains upon second inspection look to be more of a coloration, due to thier uniformity and parallelism, the color blends and is fixed to the object in the same manner the blue/black tip is. I am voting a crustacean component, a crab claw of some sort is a good guess. The author the dubious mister mcdonald has comprised these "startling" new theories for is a gentlman by the name of Steve Alten. his website is www.stevealten.com and the new book is a classic "jaws with a twist" type piece called "The Loch." This has got to be by every indication a fairly poor hoax, probably contrived to sell Mr. Alten's Books. Alan J. Adams · April 13, 2005 11:51 PM I'm still leaning towards a crab claw -- and not necessarily one of the opposing pincers. Take a look at this photo of a spider crab in the Royal Museum of Scotland. (You'll have to scroll, then click for detail.) And here are some decent pictures of nearby species. Eric Scheie · April 14, 2005 04:06 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Reminds me, a lot, of a horn. Especially the root section where it would attach to the mouth (or rather scull) of whatever animal grew it. This would also fit with the perpendicular points, as they could lock with similar points on the horns of the opposing animal (as deer horns have evolved to do) so help the horns to remain locked together and not slip.