![]() |
|
![]()
March 15, 2005
Love and war: an impatient pair
Now in the spring, at the time when kings go out to war . . . This damned winter is holding on with a vengeance, and doesn't want to let go. The last days of winter are usually much colder than the first days of winter. We speak of summer "fading" into fall, and fall "fading" into winter. But no one ever speaks of winter as "fading" into spring. Winter to spring is an out and out war. No wonder the ancients named this month (March) for the God of War. In so doing, Roman pagans were oddly in accord with the monotheists. Mars has been associated with two agricultural festivals one in March and one in October, when plants are put in the ground and when they are harvested. Roman people, although originally very pastoral, became very warlike and their wars began with the warmth of spring and ended as the weather grew cold in the autumn. This coincided with the two agricultural festivals of Mars. The Roman army gathered in Mars' temple for ritual and ceremony before going into battle and again, at the end of the war year, this time to purify their weapons. The main temple of Mars was also used as an exercising ground for the army. This may be how Mars and Ares became associated. Also, wars were often begun in March, the month named for Mars, because it was the beginning of spring.One difference between the pagans and the monotheists was that in the case of the former (at least with regard to Mars) no particular contradiction seems to have been seen between war and sex: The month March (Martius) is named after him. As the god of war, many of his festivals were held in the spring, the beginning of the campaign season. He was a god of spring, growth in nature, and fertility, and the protector of cattle. On March 1, the Feriae Marti was celebrated. The Armilustrium was held on October 19, the end of the campaigning season, the weapons of the soldiers were ritually purified and stored for winter.But many monotheists tend to see spring as a time for war, with sex being a sort of evil distraction. What David considered a casual dalliance with Bathsheba, he demonstrated his contempt for the creation of life (11:1-5). The Bible hints at his coming moral lapse in noting that in the spring of the year when kings go forth to battle, David tarried in Jerusalem. Had he been where he should have been, his sexual sin probably would never have happened. While his armies fought Israel’s wars, the king relaxed on his rooftop patio. Observing a beautiful woman as she bathed, he sent a messenger to invite her to see him. She complied.I can understand why avoidance of war might be seen as a moral lapse, but I don't think it follows that sex and war are antithetical in nature. (In nature they most definitely are not antithetical!) I don't think you have to be a fundamentalist pagan to maintain that it isn't necessarily an either-or. posted by Eric on 03.15.05 at 12:18 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|