![]() |
|
![]()
March 03, 2005
Strategic mistake?
Back to the Der Spiegel article on the brutal "honor killing" of Hatin Surucu: At a memorial vigil held a few weeks after Hatin's death, a mere 120 people showed up. Almost none were Turkish. In fact, most were from a lesbian and gay organization that -- outraged by the crime -- organized the make-shift ceremony.Yet the killing had nothing to do with gay rights. Where were the feminists? Whether in Germany or America, I'm still baffled by feminist silence over honor killings, and I'm wondering whether attributing it solely to anti-Americanism might be overlooking a more pragmatic reason. If we assume that feminist theoreticians aren't complete morons (for the sake of argument, OK?), surely they must understand the following two basic concepts: I'm wondering whether the war with the West is the key to understanding. Might it be that many feminists would privately acknowledge the horrors of Islamic patriarchy? Yet because Western "capitalist patriarchy" has been enemy number one for decades, they now see an opportunity to sit back on the sidelines and watch two enemies battle it out. Isn't this is in line with the basic principle of never interfering when two enemies go to war? Even if the West is seen as the more powerful of the two, the reason for sitting out a war while enemies battle it out is that both enemies will inevitably be weakened by it. Supporting the West would, in feminist terms, require acquiescence to the innate superiority of capitalist patriarchy, and, seen this way, any victory by the West would be seen as defeating feminism. If feminists are thinking this way, they are very wrong. While women are excluded from all male activities under fundamentalist Islam, in the West they serve in the military. Two have been Secretaries of State. The next presidential election is shaping up to be a woman running against a woman. War between patriarchies? Hell no! If anything, we're in a war which would protect (if not advance) feminist gains. Silence by American feminists about the horrors of Islamic patriarchy hurts their own cause. It also makes them increasingly irrelevant. posted by Eric on 03.03.05 at 09:55 AM
Comments
They get a free ride from feminists under the multicultural flag.... kinda sad. Spike · March 9, 2005 02:27 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
What sort of monster would murder his own sister?
Is this a philosophy we can allow to exist?
In another news item, I read that families would send out younger brothers to do the murder, because German judges are lenient towards young criminals. Another part of that story said that families forced the brothers to kill.
Of course, the recent ruling by the Supreme Court will have absolutely no effect on things like that here.