|
December 15, 2004
Liberal student sounds off for academic freedom!
I find it admirable that David Horowitz has published a long editorial from a liberal student who, among other things, is offended by Horowitz! I find most of David Horowitz's right-wing views to be offensive. I lead an anti-war rally at Foothill College, and I voted against George W. Bush both times. That having been said, intellectual pluralism is not a political issue. We must treat intellectual pluralism as an issue of intellectual freedom. Both liberal students and conservative students ought to be free to express their ideas in the classroom. My story describes the denial of student rights and opinions, grade manipulation and favoritism. It also describes the six-month long battle I fought with Foothill College, and the College's attempt to silence myself, my views, and my retelling of what happened in within a Foothill College classroom.The entire piece is a must-read, as it documents intolerance and bigotry by a professor on the right as well as another professor on the left. The right wing professor blatantly assigned an "F" grade because a student disagreed with his views on abortion, while the left wing professor "recommended psychological therapy to an Arab student who had praised the U.S. Constitution." In both instances the school refuses to respect academic pluralism: the Foothill College bureaucracy, all the way up to President Bernadine Fong, have chosen to treat to ignore the larger issue and silence individual cases. As a result, intellectual pluralism has been ruined, and Foothill College no longer an institution of free ideas.The student concludes with a plea that Foothill College's board of trustees implement the Academic Bill of Rights. While I haven't verified the student's allegations, I applaud David Horowitz for publishing the views of one of his critics. In any event, I wholeheartedly support the Academic Bill of Rights, which consists of a simple, common-sense codification of what I always thought was supposed to be traditional academic freedom. posted by Eric on 12.15.04 at 11:02 AM
Comments
I find most of David Horowitz's right-wing views to be offensive. I'm feeling a Dean scream coming on. Why is no one actively challenging such smarminess? Darleen · December 15, 2004 04:06 PM Well, I can only speak for myself, Darleen, but let me stick out my neck here. I'd go so far as to say that "advocating vouchers or a flat tax" is NOT "the social equivalent of dropping ones drawers and defecating on the livingroom floor." I realize that many people will find that mere statement offensive, of course. And I apologize profusely for the incalculable damage I may have done to their self esteem.... Steven, I trust you can do a better job than I of explaining why my failure to be offended is itself offensive. (For reasons I can't fathom, I've managed to offend a lot of people that way....) Eric Scheie · December 15, 2004 04:39 PM I'm my circle liberal elites, talking about a "flat tax" is in fact the social equivalent of doing what Darlene says ... Moreover, it is often accompanied by that very act. What strange company we keep. bink · December 16, 2004 01:35 PM Ach ... I'm my circle OF liberal elites ... bink · December 16, 2004 01:37 PM We are living in the Age of the Offended. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · December 16, 2004 05:31 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
This young man sounds like a true liberal. Too many of the Right have used "liberal" as a pejorative and a synonym for radical or Leftist. It isn't. I call anybody a liberal if he believes in freedom of thought and expression, and I _won't_ call him liberal if he doesn't. The Left used to be much more liberal, but it has increasingly become totalitarian. Most of the real liberals today are to be found on the Right or the non-Left, e.g., Dean Esmay.
Reminds me of Alexander Mieklejohn, that great liberal of the 1950s and early 1960s. I don't hear of him any more. I have a book by him on democracy and free speech. E. Merrill Root once called him "that great mind of the Left", as Alexander Mieklejohn appreciated that fact that Christ's answer to the question about Caesar's coin was the _height_ of intellectual power.
E. Merrill Root and Alexander Mieklejohn. The Conservative and the Liberal. The _style_ of that polarity!