|
December 09, 2004
How to avoid morning frustration the night before . . .
I should have read InstaPundit before I went to bed last night. Ought to be a ritual like brushing my teeth. Seriously, I'm not saying this to compliment Glenn Reynolds, but he has a way of spotting the really important stuff -- things that Drudge misses, and things I'd certainly miss. Had I seen that link last night, I'd have been less frustrated this morning. A blogger called Silent Running spotted this exchange on PBS and put it in his blog: TERENCE SMITH: Well, what about a blogger, Floyd Abrams?Floyd Abrams, of course, is the lead attorney in what is the most important First Amendment case (and news story) to come along in years. Saying bloggers are included in the journalistic privilege is huge news. Yet according to a story I managed to spot in this morning's Philadelphia Inquirer, the issue is merely whether the New York Times (and Time magazine) reporters should be forced to comply with subpoenas in the Plame case: WASHINGTON - An attorney for two journalists subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury asked a federal court yesterday to rule that they do not have to disclose their confidential sources in an investigation into the leak of a covert CIA officer's name.For over an hour, I've had only one question: WHY WOULD A STORY OF THIS MAGNITUDE BE BURIED ON PAGE A-20? It's not even in the front section, much less the front page! Why? This made no sense at all, until I caught up with last night's reading. What's good news for bloggers is not considered good news. And of course, what's not reported in the Inquirer accounts for the burial of this otherwise highly important story. As Jonah Goldberg puts it: What's particularly ironic is that the big-media lawyers fear the courts will allow a blanket shield for journalists because there's no way to exclude one-man-band web journalists — bloggers — from the new right. And what's the point of giving the nobility a new privilege if any peasant can take advantage of it, too? (Via Glenn Reynolds.)Ah, but the peasants can't take advantage of it if they don't know about it! MORE OLD NEWS: Now I'm having an attack of recovered lost memory syndrome.... Does anyone remember last summer when bloggers attended conventions? Some REAL journalists didn't like it at all, and didn't mind letting us know about it: "I think that bloggers have put the issue of professionalism under attack," said Thomas McPhail, professor of media studies at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, who argues that journalists should be professionally credentialed. "They have no pretense to objectivity. They don't cover both sides."They don't cover both sides? (Like both sides of the Plame litigation?) Funny, but all these years I thought that was a major complaint about "real" journalists.... posted by Eric on 12.09.04 at 08:35 AM
Comments
I'm sure the monks felt the same way about Herr Guttenburg. Ted B. · December 9, 2004 05:01 PM He puts it well about bloggers: "They have no pretense to objectivity." [emphasis mine] That pretense is precisely the problem with the "mainstream" media, in my opinion. If they were open about their biases, we'd all be a lot better off. As for myself, I freely admit that I am biased. I openly boast that I look at the world through eyes that are biased in favor of Polytheistic Godliness, Selfishness, Sexiness, and the values that flow from these primary values of mine. Up With Beauty! Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · December 9, 2004 06:47 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Yeah, journalists should be "credentialed". People need to be licensed to practice free-speech. After all, the 1st amendment is regulated under the Commerce Clause.
[Am I having trouple spelling today?]