|
December 02, 2004
Specially protected slime?
Maureen Dowd is upset about male authority figures: The networks don't even give lip service to looking for women and blacks for anchor jobs - they just put pretty-boy clones in the pipeline.As noted by Jim Geraghty, to be an "authority figure" (at least, to be on more than an equal footing with "someone in a bathroom with a modem") one must not only be male, but one must have the right facial appearance: ...you work in a medium where you would still be doing the traffic report back in Elmira, N.Y. if you looked like Dennis Kucinich. In other words, you've got your job because you're pretty. I'm not sure you should be shooting your mouth off about other people's qualifications to do the news. (Via Glenn Reynolds.)So, it's not just daddy the masses are looking for; it's pretty daddy! It's interesting that pretty daddy Williams' bathroom attack was launched shortly after Bill O'Reilly called Dan Rather a victim who'd been "slimed." Not that I like ad hominem attacks, but Rather was not attacked for being Dan Rather (which, after all, he's been for decades), but for adamantly refusing to do what any blogger would do if he relied on forged documents: admit and correct his mistake. But wait a minute! No true "authority figure" is ever supposed to admit making mistakes! Not even pretty daddies. This may touch on a crucial distinction between bloggers and the MSM. By launching his latest attack on the blogosphere, O'Reilly makes clear that it is not attacks per se that he is against; indeed, how could this quarrelsome, pugnacious man oppose attacking others? Rather, his quarrel is over who should get to do the attacking. O'Reilly thinks that only the anointed -- what used to be called "the authorities" -- should have such privileges. As Eugene Volokh (via Glenn Reynolds) made clear in today's New York Times, these so-called authorities should enjoy no special privileges. Yet they do. It's one thing for someone to be hired because he has a pretty face, or has an authoritative "look" which might assist in bringing bigger network ratings. But when special legal privileges are granted exempting the pretty daddies from the same rules which apply to everyone else, that's unelected power. I can't think of a worse form of tyranny than actually making a real authority figure out of someone hired largely because of his appearance. Where is the accountability? Are doctrines of Constitutional Law henceforth to be driven by network ratings? Worse yet, once exemptions from the law are created, the authority figures will want them extended. Bill O'Reilly has it in for the blogosphere because they repeatedly dared to criticize him. This, he feels, is unfair, because only he and similarly situated "authorities" should be allowed the First Amendment right to criticize. By implication, O'Reilly imagines that bloggers are "immune" from criticism and the tactics of "sliming" he condemns. He forgets that bloggers are all in the same playing field. They can just as easily be criticized -- and have their jobs threatened -- as can Bill O'Reilly or Dan Rather. (More here from Joe Gandelman, via Glenn Reynolds.) The difference is that in the blogosphere, while there may be unfairness, there's no anointed, unaccountable class. It's pretty much a level playing field and a meritocracy. That's something many of the Old Media authorities and like-minded people would love to change. How? Installation of gate-keepers was proposed back in 1999, but never implemented. I suppose the "authorities" could always orchestrate a vast "sliming" of individual bloggers, but the blogosphere has already shown itself to be pretty resilient. Many of us are accustomed to being slimed . . . Besides, as O'Reilly himself admits, we can't be fired! MORE: As a typical example of what distinguishes blogging from MSM reporting [in this case, opinion writing], in today's Philadelphia Inquirer, columnist Monica Yant Kinney attempts to target SUV drivers for shame/blame in the context of the recent Delaware River oil spill: Seventy percent of the oil that winds up in Northeastern SUVs first makes a pit stop along the Delaware.Ms. Kinney surely reads her own newspaper, and so she must be charged with knowing that the spilled oil was headed for a CITGO asphalt refinery. Asphalt goes into roads and roofs, and has little or no relationship with SUVs. Scolding SUV drivers with such statistics is, under the circumstances, disingenous, although I don't expect anything like a correction. (More below on the oil spill.) posted by Eric on 12.02.04 at 10:22 AM
Comments
The Great Duel.... Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · December 3, 2004 04:05 PM (Mr. Teal, Mr. Bearse, Mr. Drill, Mr. Newkirk -- fat, male [Transcendental Science?], conservative, all these men taught "social studies" and they were also sports coaches.) Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · December 5, 2004 11:05 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"My Country, 'tis of thee
Sweet Land of Authority,
of thee I sing...."
"Authority, Authority,
From sea to shining sea...."
Authority. When I think of Authority, Authority figures, many things come to my mind. Many pleasant memories, many fascinating fantasies. Thomas Molnar once wrote a book "Authority and Its Enemies". That was during the Nixon era. Authority: Nixon, Agnew, Haldeman, Ehrlichman.... Authority. I think of certain teachers I had. Mr. Teal, Mr. Bearse, Mr. Drill, Mr. Newkirk.
My Grandpa (Cato the Mighty) once asked my Dad: "The police sure are reactionary, aren't they?" And my Dad (a professor of history) replied: "Yup. Law and Order. Authority."
"We must Obey Those in Authority! We must Conserve the Laws and Institutions of Our Society! Law and Order must be Conserved around the Clock!.... I say SUBBHPPHORT THAT LAW! SEND THEM TO BBBBHPPPRISON! ....SUBBHPPORT THE BBHPPRESIDENT AND THE BBBHPPPOPE!"
-Chief Justice George Immanuel Bork (conservative, fat, evil)
Do I have an Authoritarian Personality?
And, now, increasingly, the two opposing centers of ideational Authority: the University vs. the Cathedral. The President of the University supporting wicked Wanda (atheism, evolution, science, relativity, license, promiscuity, the metric system) vs. Bishop de Bey supporting holy Dawn and her holy Negro wife Norma (polytheism, creation, myth, absolutes, discipline, Total Commitment marriage, the Gothic system). Who will win?....
Around and around it goes, where it stops nobody knows....