|
August 24, 2004
Vetting for victory?
Does anyone remember Admiral Boorda? He committed suicide back in 1996 because of a flap over the illegitimate display of the "V for Valor" on his medals: WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The nation's top Navy officer, Adm. Jeremy Michael Boorda, died Thursday from an apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound hours after learning Newsweek magazine was raising questions about the legitimacy of some of his combat medals.Many people wouldn't understand why Boorda might feel such shame, but not those with an understanding of the military. Honor is everything. I thought of Admiral Boorda because today I learned about a similar flap involving John Kerry: Now, on the heels of yet another revelation—that Kerry’s DD 214 (“Report of Transfer or Separation”), displayed on his website, shows his Silver Star embellished with an unauthorized “V” for valor—which makes it facially false and at variance with official government records (see our article, John Kerry’s Mysterious Combat “V”)—it has come to light that his Silver Star award is fraught with other peculiarities.There's much more about the three citations for the same medal, and while I'm no military expert, it strikes me as odd that a four star admiral would bother to do a third rewrite for a lieutenant junior grade. Connections, perhaps? Then there's the "V." Unbelievable as it sounds, the presence of an unauthorize "V" might constitute a federal crime: The presence of the combat “V” with Kerry’s Silver Star on his DD 214 raises two extremely disquieting questions. How did the unauthorized “V” get there, and why has Kerry allowed it to remain?The unauthorized "V" may have been a bureaucratic error committed long ago, but as the author (distinguished legal scholar Henry Mark Holzer) points out, Kerry has had years to correct it, yet his DD 214 still displays the "V" for Valor language. I don't think this is one of the Swift Boat veterans' allegations, but if it's true (which it appears to be), once again the question becomes, is it relevant? It strikes me that if career military guys commit suicide over these things, it may be..... Didn't anybody vet this guy's MORE: I'm beginning to see why Kerry was never vetted as so many candidates are today. In American politics, one's opponents end up doing the vetting. Kerry was first elected to public office in 1982, when he ran for Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts as the running mate of Miichael Dukakis. (Once the primary was over, an easy win.) Two years later, Senator Tsongas retired suddenly, creating an opening, which Kerry targeted. This real race was between Kerry and his liberal opponent in the Democratic primary, one James M. Shannon -- who went so far as to criticize Kerry not for his protesting, but for having served in Vietnam. This rightly enraged Vietnam veterans who, feeling impugned, went to bat for Kerry. His Republican opponent, Raymond Shamie, had little chance of winning in liberal Massachusetts, and nothing to gain by scrutinizing the war record of an opponent better known for being against the war than for it. (Liberal Democrats -- particularly in those days -- would not have been likely to scrutunize the military records of other liberals.) Kerry has been in the Senate since, and not until this election has his life been put under the microscope as it is now. The above biographical information, plus much more, can be read here. UPDATE (08-27-04): Via Drudge, I see that the Combat "V" flap has now hit the mainstream press: the official records on Kerry's Web site only add to the confusion. The DD214 form, an official Defense Department document summarizing Kerry's military career posted on johnkerry.com, includes a "Silver Star with combat V."Once again, it's hard to believe that the professional dirt diggers who work for the Democratic Party didn't know about this. Does anyone think Kerry will release his records? UPDATE (09/02/04): Glenn Reynolds (a previous skeptic on this matter) now characterizes the story as having "some legs." And according to the the story he links, Kerry was himself critical of Boorda! At the time, Mr. Kerry told the Boston Globe that Boorda’s conduct was “sufficient to question [Boorda’s] leadership position.…If you wind up being less than what you’re pretending to be, there is a major confrontation with value and self-esteem and your sense of how others view you.”Under the circumstances, I think I should at least be allowed to say "OUCH!" posted by Eric on 08.24.04 at 02:41 PM
Comments
Hail to the Roman Empire! Henry Mark Holzer. Hmmm.... Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato the Elder) the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · August 26, 2004 06:00 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I'd like to put to rest the rumor that 'V' stood for 'Varius' and to reassure everyone that the latest flap had nothing to do with putting that name to rest.