When the country was in the best of pants....

Even though I quoted the man recently, I never thought I'd need to concern myself about the contents of Sandy Berger's pants! But this story is hard to ignore:

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Clinton's national security adviser, Sandy Berger, is the focus of a Justice Department investigation after removing highly classified terrorism documents and handwritten notes from a secure reading room during preparations for the Sept. 11 commission hearings, The Associated Press has learned.

Berger's home and office were searched earlier this year by FBI agents armed with warrants after he voluntarily returned documents to the National Archives. However, still missing are some drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the Clinton administration's handling of al-Qaida terror threats during the December 1999 millennium celebration.

Berger and his lawyer said Monday night he knowingly removed handwritten notes he had made while reading classified anti-terror documents at the archives by sticking them in his jacket and pants. He also inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio, they said.

"I deeply regret the sloppiness involved, but I had no intention of withholding documents from the commission, and to the contrary, to my knowledge, every document requested by the commission from the Clinton administration was produced," Berger said in a statement to the AP.

Lanny Breuer, one of Berger's attorneys, said his client has offered to cooperate fully with the investigation but had not yet been interviewed by the FBI or prosecutors. Berger has been told he is the subject of the criminal investigation, Breuer said.

There's a lot of speculation about what Sandy Berger was up to, but one thing is clear to me: unless you have an uncontrollable sexual compulsion, you don't inadvertently stick things in your pants. So far as I know, the documents weren't X-rated.

Via Glenn Reynolds, here's Ed Morrisey, who has a background in working with classified documents:

It's been well over a decade since I worked on such material, but I can tell you the rules even now. It's not just the document itself nor the data that's classified -- it's both, together and separately. If you jot down classified information in the form of notes, they're just as classified as the source material, and even in case of any doubt, you have to treat them as the same classification level until the proper authority can review them. What's more, as a former NSA, Sandy Berger damned well knows this. You cannot take notes from a classified document and just walk out with them in an unsecured and unapproved manner -- and since Berger stuffed them down his pants, I suspect he is well aware of this.

Remember, the Democrats had American national security in this man's hands (and his pants, apparently) for eight years, and Kerry promises more of the same. Chilling, isn't it?

Definitely chilling. But whether this will have a chilling effect on national security is another matter. My problem is that Berger and guys who think like him are unable to separate their own monumental, power-addicted egos from national security. They tend to think that the country's national security would be better off in their hands (OK, pants), and thus they don't see the rules as applicable to them.

This is reflected in comments by Berger friend and colleague David Gergen:

David Gergen, who was an adviser to Clinton and worked with Berger for a time in the White House, said Tuesday, "I think it's more innocent than it looks."

Appearing on NBC's "Today" show, Gergen said, "I have known Sandy Berger for a long time. He would never do anything to compromise the security of the United States." (Via Glenn Reynolds.)

Oddly, I agree with Gergen, at least as to what's inside Berger's mind. He presided over the country's national security apparatus for years, he's now Kerry's leading foreign policy advisor, and he wants his job back! To him, the right man -- SANDY BERGER -- being in charge is in the country's national security interests. Therefore, anything he can do to help Kerry is in the best interests of national security.

(I guess such thinking can charitably called "good intentions....")

That we live in a constitutional republic not run by third world kleptocrats (who typically claim that what's best for them is best for the country) doesn't seem to have occurred to him.

But I don't wanna be too hard on the man; perhaps he's been hanging out with the wrong crowd....

No prison time! (But I think it's fair to get into the documents' chain of custody, and maybe take a look at Berger's meetings and phone logs, etc.....)

And in Berger's defense, though, I will say that he may be a prisoner of his own history, repeating a strategy that worked before:

When Clinton made his numbingly long-winded address to the 1988 Democratic National Convention, Berger was there, assuring him that it was not a career-killing disaster.

Throughout the 1992 campaign, he served as foreign policy adviser to Clinton. Berger's goal then, as recalled by campaign veterans, was to make sure the Arkansas governor at least did not get humiliated on foreign policy issues by the more experienced George Bush.

This dependent relationship created an unusual bond. "Sandy provided a comfort level on a subject on which the president was manifestly uncomfortable," said one White House aide.

Speaking of history, here's a Berger quote from 1998:
Clinton's National Security Advisor Sandy Berger stated in the Washington Times in 1998: "Other products [besides VX gas] were made at Al Shifa. But we have seen such dual--use plants before -- in Iraq. And, indeed, we have information that Iraq has assisted in chemical- weapons activity in Sudan." Now working in the Kerry camp, both Sandy Berger and Jamie Rubin defended the bombing of that plant by stating that Iraq was assisting al Qaeda make deadly VX gas.
I suppose it's possible that Berger wants to hide something (or perhaps "un-say" something), but I don't see how stuffing it in his pants is an effective tactic at this late stage.

Whether this is a tragedy or a comedy depends on your perspective. I've just never trusted people who want to apply to others rules from which they exempt themselves.

UPDATE: Virginia Postrel is also willing to give "Bumbling Berger" a break, but hates the hypocrisy involved. And Stephen Green (whose cool new blog design I love, by the way) really knows pants!

....[T]he former National Security Advisor to President Clinton stuffed classified information down his pants and walked (a bit oddly, I'd wager) to his car. So that I might not be labeled a partisan hack, let me first say something in Sandy's defense – at least he didn't also have a shredder down there. Because you just know that Fawn Hall could have destroyed top secret documents with a top-secret spy device hidden in her not-so-Top-Secret cotton thong.

And before we continue with this sad excuse for an essay, let us be thankful that I didn't use this segue to force you to picture Sandy Berger in a cotton thong.

Now then. The fact that Berger stole classified data doesn't bother me. The fact that he stuffed them down his pants doesn't bother me.

....What bothers me – and what should bother you – is that the man who was too concerned with the law to get Osama when he had the chance, was rather cavalier about the law when it came to shoving classified items down his 46-inch waistband.

Sandy Berger covered his ass, quite literally, with the papers which, just might, show how he inadvertently helped Osama bin Laden murder the asses of 3,000 of Berger's fellow Americans. (Via Glenn Reynolds.)

How do you spell national security? C.Y.A.?

UPDATE: It appears that Berger still hasn't given back all the documents!

However, some drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the Clinton administration's handling of Al Qaeda terror threats during the December 1999 millennium celebration are still missing, officials and lawyers said. Officials said the missing documents also identified America's terror vulnerabilities at airports to seaports.
This may be a bigger scandal than we think.

No wonder it didn't make the New York Times! (Via Glenn Reynolds.)

posted by Eric on 07.20.04 at 08:38 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1199






Comments

When I saw that my local Houston Chronicle had front-paged it, I just sort of assumed that every rag in the country would. I mean, how can you not?

Silly me.

Beck   ·  July 20, 2004 02:34 PM

The then-National Security Grand Poobah LOST documents detailing airport and seaport vulnerabilities? Like they were car keys or something??

Persnickety   ·  July 20, 2004 02:35 PM


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits