|
April 10, 2004
Everything that happens will be "imminent" at some point!
Let's see if I can get this right. The United States knew or should have known that al Qaida was planning to hijack planes with box cutters, then fly them into buildings, because there were warnings that this could happen. Imminent threat, perhaps? Clear warnings: Clinton administration officials say they bluntly warned the incoming Bush administration of the imminent threat from Al Qaeda Well, I guess we could argue about whether it was an "imminent threat," but certainly considering Khobar Towers, the African embassy bombings, and the U.S.S. Cole, there was something which might have been capable of developing into an imminent threat, based on.... intelligence? Intelligence which should not have been ignored! say the Democrats. But because Bush, this thinking goes, ignored the imminent threat, 9-11 happened. Well, Bush better not ignore any more imminent threats! (Not that the Democrats would ever do anything like that.) Megan McArdle offers an excellent analysis of the predictive value of intelligence, and concludes: Clinton didn't know. Bush didn't know. We didn't know. And the uncomfortable possibility remains that there are more events that we not only don't know about--but can't know about. Deluding ourselves otherwise isn't helping. And if it causes us to take costly, fruitless measures to reassure ourselves, it could actively hurt us. (Via Will Collier.) Suppose, just for the sake of discussion, that Bush had not invaded Iraq. That we just stopped with Afghanistan, and hoped that al Qaida had just stayed out of Iraq, and that Saddam Hussein would watch his step. How many Democrats warned that Saddam Hussein's regime had WMDs? (I doubt I could count them all.) Would Bush be vulnerable now to a claim that just as he "ignored" a threat from al Qaida, now he was ignoring an imminent threat from Iraq, that this was very dangerous, and that something must be done? After-the-fact "imminence" tends to be a damned if you do, damned if you don't deal. And suppose 9-11 had been prevented! We'd never have heard the end of it. Here's Neal Boortz (via Glenn Reynolds) reflecting on the Rice testimony: ....[I]magine if on September 10th, 2001, President George W. Bush, citing increased "chatter" about an attack on the United States decided to shut down all airports nationwide. Furthermore, in an address to the nation he announces that Osama Bin Laden is behind the threats and has decided to invade Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban. Can you imagine the response? The same people pinning responsibility for 9/11 on the Bush administration for not doing enough would be calling for his head. And then, when nothing happened as a result of all of these measures, people would be blaming Bush for overreacting. Anyone who believes otherwise needs their head examined. Remember the Air France planes we grounded not that long ago? The U.S. got blamed for being too aggressive. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.Obviously, if 9-11 had not happened, it wouldn't have been imminent! You really don't have to be Alice in Wonderland to figure it out. You can be sure of one thing. There'll be lots more of this stuff. Because the election isn't even imminent yet! UPDATE: Be sure not to miss Gregg Easterbrook's hilarious alternative history -- the impeachment of George W. Bush for going after the Taliban on August 7, 2001. (Via InstaPundit.) It turned out the threat just wasn't imminent after all! posted by Eric on 04.10.04 at 08:53 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|