|
March 16, 2004
Another Kerry endorsement
Which foreign leaders are endorsing Kerry? Well, shortly before his election last week, Spain's new president-elect Jose Rodriguez Zapatero said he wanted Kerry to win: But opinion in Spain, as in Britain, is divided. The Spanish opposition leader in the general election this Sunday, the socialist José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, said yesterday: "I think Kerry will win. I want Kerry to win."I think when you say you want someone to win, that's an endorsement. I hope no one is denying this....
UPDATE: More details here (from the Majorca Daily Bulletin) on what Zapatero actually plans to do for Senator Kerry: Zapatero fights losing battleSo, this isn't just a passing remark; coming to the United States and working for Kerry is the "first thing" Zapatero will do! At least, that was his campaign promise.... Once again, I have not read my local newspapers in detail, and it is possible that all of this is being reported. (I have not see it anywhere in the American press, though.) When I find out that it has been, I promise to update this post. Till then, should I hold my breath?
MORE ON THE GUARDIAN: I'm glad I posted the cache of the Guardian article because, as Andrew Sullivan points out, the Guardian's policy is one of "complete moral nihilism in the face of unspeakable violence": In Europe, there are no bad guys, even those who deliberately murdered almost 200 innocents and threaten to murder countless more. Ask yourself: If the Guardian cannot call these people "bad guys," then who qualifies? And if the leaders of democratic societies cannot qualify in this context as "good guys," then who qualifies? What we have here is complete moral nihilism in the face of unspeakable violence. Then we have the absurd canard that there is a "divide between Muslim and Christian communities." There is no such divide. There is a divide within Islam between a large majority and a small minority of theocratic, extremist mass-murderers, men and women who have killed Muslim, Christian, and Jew alike, young and old, and almost always innocent bystanders in free societies. That small minority has terrorized large populations, enslaved women, killed Jews and homosexuals, launched a war against Western civilians, taken over whole countries, and targeted individual writers and thinkers for murder. With them we need a dialogue? With them we need an unremitting, unrelenting, unapologetic war. (Via Glenn Reynolds.)Appallingly, the Guardian said that "We need to get beyond the them and us, the good guys and the bad guys." I don't think it's unreasonable to imagine that a newspaper refuses to call the killing 200 innocent civilians "bad" might alter its records. It's very worrisome to me that there are so many people who think wars can be voted out of existence. MORE: According to a UPI report, the election had less to do with Al Qaida than Aznar's machinations: [I]nterpreting these events as Spain's surrender to terrorism would be gross oversimplification of the facts.Manipulation of the press? Can't two play at that game? Who did "the press" favor before? Were they in fact "manipulated"? Independent polls carried out on Wednesday, the day before the bombings, showed the Socialists ahead with a slight majority.If this is true, then why the claim now of manipulation? It seems to me that this claim would have been made regardless of who won the election. Surely Al Qaida realizes they had absolutely nothing to do with it. Maybe Bush is behind it all. I don't expect to hear much more about Zapatero and Kerry. It's none of my business.
Zapatero is a little like what many women imagine as the ideal son-in-law. He comes accross as charming and friendly with his boyish face. On top of that he is athletic, thin and good-looking.I'm glad that's settled! Appearances are everything!
This is almost enough to engender linkophobia. Surely the Spanish press isn't trying to "Kerry" favor? posted by Eric on 03.16.04 at 01:19 PM
Comments
If Kerry keeps going like this, Bush won't need to campaign, and the Democrats will wish they'd gone with Howard Dean. Eric Scheie · March 16, 2004 11:09 PM I would suspect that Vladamir Putin and Fidel Castro will be the ones 'not named' to be on board the Kerry train. El Jefe · March 18, 2004 10:28 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Hmmm.... A Spanish socialist (elected in capitulation to terror), Kim Jong-Il, and the Ayatollahs of Iran. No wonder Kerry wants to keep his foreign endorsements private. More embarrassing than the things Clinton tried to keep private. At least, they would be to me. Everything I've seen so far tells me Bush is going to win this election.