Today's news revisits old conspiracy theories:

Favish, known as a Clinton antagonist, told the court that the Freedom of Information Act did not give any special privacy rights to relatives.

He is backed in the case, Office of Independent Counsel v. Favish, by media groups. They argue the government is trying to get a ruling that would keep too much information off-limits and hurt journalists trying to uncover wrongdoing and abuse in federal agencies.

The legal issue seems to be whether Vincent Foster's family's potential embarrassment (over pictures of the dead White House Counsel) outweighs the public right to examine documentary evidence of a possible government coverup.

Well, Foster is as dead as JFK. But his hard drive lingers on. My tax dollars paid for it, and I don't see what is so unreasonable about wanting to know what's in it.

Sure hope this isn't another bipartisan coverup....

Hey! Can I be nominated for the position of "known Vincent Foster hard drive coverup antagonist"? That sounds like the job for me!

(For those of you who missed my first post on the subject, this quote from Boris Badenov pretty much sums up my feelings.)