|
June 13, 2007
Winning by shutting up the loudest?
When I first contemplated the candidacy of Fred Thompson in mid-March, my reaction was positive. I was sick of the election then, and I'm more sick of it now, but I might as well repeat what I said: I would not be surprised to find that because Thompson is the equivalent of genuine combat veteran of the worst political war this country has seen in modern times, he has a different view of the process than your typical ego-driven, hard-charging political animal.Since then, he's made it clear that he doesn't need to be dragged into running, but at the same time, I think he's wise enough to be cognizant of a genuine problem which is missed by the political junkies. The problem is, it's too early to be sick of the election -- mainly because it's too early for there to be an election to be sick of! (That this is lost on political junkies is not surprising, because like any other variety of junkie, they have a craving not shared by non-junkies.) What I like most about Fred Thompson is that he doesn't seem to be in all that much of a hurry to kowtow to the political junkies. I think he senses that there's huge disgust among ordinary people over the growing movement to estabish a national culture of, of.... Election addiction? I don't know exactly what to call it. Many commentators have been talking of campaign fatigue -- and if there's fatigue at this early stage, what are the implications for the future? If one thing's certain, it's that the culture of "premature election" (which is what this is) will not go away anytime soon. Instead, it will get more and more relentless. There's already talk of ruining the Fourth of July with more premature announcements that people just don't want to hear. So far, Fred Thompson has made it quite clear that he won't mind being a candidate when he's good and ready, but he doesn't seem to be in a hurry to insult ordinary voters by being in everybody's face. It's a delicate balancing act, but I hope he keeps it up, because I hate this seemingly irreversible process of premature elections that won't go away. For shutting up the loudest and not beating people over the head, Fred Thompson gets an A. As to how to go on being a front runner (or near front runner) without running in a campaign nearly all normal non-junkie types are totally sick of, I wouldn't know how to advise him, though. Maybe he can make his announcement, then take a summer vacation. UPDATE: I'd be willing to bet that Fred Thompson neither owns nor wears a pair of these. (The wearing of which a prominent law professor deems impeachable.) posted by Eric on 06.13.07 at 08:08 AM
Comments
Eric, I like Thompson, too, but I've been burned too many times before by politicians. And since he was always soft on illegal immigration before, why should I believe that he will suddenly change his spots on this issue anymore than I should believe that Rudy Giuliani will? Granted, a traditionally restrictionist candidate like Tancredo or Hunter could always get bought off and break my heart, but at least there's a chance that such a candidate might hold true to his long professed beliefs. I don't see any chance that a Giuliani or Thompson will suddenly see the light. And no matter how tough a candidate talks on the War on Terror, it's difficult defending a nation that has ceased to exist. Regards, Nicholas Stix · June 13, 2007 10:39 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2007
May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Vital issue of national importance
putting an alliance where a war ought to be is cultural treason! Winning by shutting up the loudest? Fusion News: Chris Wants Some Help "Can you play something to make me feel happy?" Preventive Health care, John Edwards style Praying For Fusion war on dogs? Adjusting my tinfoil sensitivity If you don't like it, move to flyover country!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Here's the thing about Fred. He is the every-man's man. We have a crowded room of sycophants sucking up to every minor interest group and playing identity politics to the highest form. Americans want action over words. I don't need to feel better about what you plan on doing. I want you to do what is best for America as an American. Sure, I'd like to be kept in the loop, but if I'm secure in the knowledge that you have the best interests of the country in mind (and not the best interests of your political party), I'm ok with secret deals and back-room hand-shakes. And Fred probably isn't going to fall into the typical corruption traps ... he has that 30 seconds of acting he gets paid for every night and a wife that makes Lewinski look like a tramp. Corruption Scotchgard.