|
February 14, 2007
Just because you can do it does not make it right
Gerard Van der Leun offers some words of wisdom over the John Edwards campaign blogger controversy: Without referencing the Edwards bloggers, I would note that over time people change and at certain moments people online write things they later regret out of passion or ignorance. Over time, people's situations change as do their needs and views.He's absolutely right, and while I think it's perfectly OK to take someone's opinions into account in hiring, there's something absolutely disgusting about using online life as a club in real life. Not that I don't expect that it will continue to happen. This was by no means the first time. Does anyone remember the frenzied attempts to get Glenn Reynolds fired for wearing the diversity gun t-shirt in a humorous manner? Readers were urged to contact his employer, and I was so outraged that I immediately ordered one of the shirts and posed for my blog wearing it. In "retaliation" for the attempts to get him fired, Glenn made some comments about his "second career as a male model." (His modeling career did result in an unexpected consequence, though.) Despite the fact that Amanda Marcotte was not fired, her blog Pandagon is supplying her supporters with an official IRS "Information Referral" form all filled out with the name of the people who urged Edwards to fire her along with IRS contact information, and (with a clever wink-wink) making a suggestion: One thing I would certainly NOT expect is that anyone would go here[PDF], using the above as a template (or not), and stick that fucker in the mail. I certainly would be shocked if anyone were to alert all their friends and loved ones to behave similarly.This sort of thing only invites more of the same. Yeah, I know free speech has consequences, and I have a perfect right to criticize anyone for anything, and say just about anything in disagreement. This includes the right to hurl insults and vituperative language as long as it doesn't cross the line to libel or slander. And I suppose it even includes the right to contact the employer of someone I disagree with, try to get them fired, try to sic the IRS or other authorities on them, (and vice versa), but I'd never do that to anyone -- no matter how much I might disagree. I think using online life as a club in real life is about low as you can go. Unfortunately, I think there's going to be a lot more of it. posted by Eric on 02.14.07 at 11:18 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|