|
December 07, 2006
Wanting to forget
December 7 ought to be a day that no American should ever forget. Pajamas Media has a great roundup, beginning with what I consider the quote of the day (from SWAC Girl): "How on God's green earth do we expect people to remember Pearl Harbor, an event that happened 65 years ago... when many have already forgotten the terror from 9/11 that occurred just a short five years ago?"Excellent question, and I think national amnesia begins with forgetting unpleasant events that require us to take action. Pearl Harbor and the September 11 attacks both fall into this category. I think one of the reasons why some people would especially like to forget Pearl Harbor is that it's a reminder of a time when this country rose to face the occasion. People today would like to wish the present war out of existence, so Pearl Harbor makes them squeamish. As Victor Davis Hanson says, 9/11 was our Pearl Harbor: Sixty years after Pearl Harbor came another surprise attack on U.S. soil, one that was, in some ways, even worse than the "Day of Infamy."He explains why it's tougher in many ways. Read it all; there's an especially good discussion of the paradoxes. I don't think there's much question that 9/11 is our Pearl Harbor, and it doesn't surprise me that the people who'd rather forget about 9/11 would just as soon forget about Pearl Harbor. I was glad to see that those who would forget does not include the Philadelphia Inquirer, which remembered Pearl Harbor today with interviews of local veterans of the attack. Noting that the Arizona still bleeds, Bob Owens looks at some hard truths: 65 years later, BB-39 U.S.S. Arizona still bleeds, but we finished the job. The United States destroyed the enemy and the ideology that sent her to the bottom. We fought a far more capable enemy that was armed with far greater resources and weaponry, and we sustained far more casualties in individual battles than we might loose in ten years in Iraq... Yet we prevailed.It's a responsibility that begins with remembering. The truth is, it's just as painful for me to remember Pearl Harbor, because I sometimes worry that this country lacks the spirit it took to have 14 million men under arms -- 400,000 of whom never came back. It ought to be sobering -- no matter what "side" you're on. posted by Eric on 12.07.06 at 04:13 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Indeed a day which must never be forgotten.
But I think the issues today are different. 14,000,000 draftees and 450,000 dead were tragically necessary to defend an America which did not have today's vast arsenal of fusion warheads. Today we do not need to contemplate such massive sacrifices of personal freedom in order to protect ourselves.
The real question is whether we have leadership with the "spirit" to tell the terrorist-supporting states that if we are attacked again, they will be obliterated, not invaded.
Any one attack might not be the work of any one of those states, but all of them together could certainly prevent an attack -- if we gave them a strong enough incentive.
If we're not willing to use our nuclear weapons as a clear threat to protect our territory from attack, then what in the world do we have them for?