|
December 09, 2006
One way to erase "sprawl"?
Here's something for the conspiracy theorists (or just those like me with uncontrollable imaginations). I just received an email about an interesting plan to take small towns off the map: CHATTOOGAVILLE, Ga. (Dec. 9) -- Poetry Tulip has vanished. So have Due West and Po Biddy Crossroads. Cloudland and Roosterville are gone, too.Erased from the map? I thought only Stalin erased communities from the map! Relax. That's not meant as a heavy-handed moral equivalency analogy. When Stalin erased communities from the map, it was generally because they no longer existed. In Georgia, they just want to end "clutter": Georgia's Department of Transportation, which drew the new map, said that the goal was to make it clearer and less cluttered and that many of the dropped communities were mere "placeholders," generally with fewer than 2,500 people. Some are unincorporated and so small they are not even recognized by the Census Bureau.Respect for rural areas? Sorry, but in light of the new trend to discourage people from living in rural areas, "respect" for these areas would mean discouraging "sprawl." And what better way to discourage sprawl than to make it as difficult as possible for people to find charming rural communities? Of course, I'm not sure the people who make maps are smart enough to think of this, so it might be an inintended consequence. However the new maps were prepared by the state's Department of Transportation, so I'm just wondering whether some of the bureaucrats there might be inclined to sympathize with the Sierra Club's view of their proper role in combatting "sprawl": New highways are the number one cause of sprawl, according to American Farmland Trust. Build them, and the traffic will come. They may give short-term relief, but long term they just encourage more sprawl.And later, an even better idea: Tear Down a Freeway, Save a CityTaking rural communites off the map might not be much, but it's a start. MORE: I can remember when the purpose of state Departments of Transportation was to build highways, and encourage transportation. Now, they're being targeted (and infiltrated) by activists who want to change their goal into one of discouraging transportation. I can't help but notice than in Georgia the Sierra Club is hot on the job! posted by Eric on 12.09.06 at 09:32 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|