|
October 09, 2006
What I missed seems to come out eventually...
Is President Bush going wobbly on the gun issue? If so, is that being kept secret? According an activist quoted in today's Inquirer, Bush is now saying "we" have to "do something" about guns: "It took the Amish to get killed for the president of the United States to say we had to do something about guns. If people can't get the guns so freely, maybe the violence can be stopped."I miss a lot, and I've been running around trying not to think about elephants, so I figured somehow I missed the president's latest remarks. Which is odd, because I read the Inquirer daily and I read pored over yesterday's New York Times, and saw no such remarks from the president. The closest thing I could find was a statement in his radio address about the need to keep schools safe: WASHINGTON - President Bush on Saturday lamented recent "shocking acts of violence" in schools and promised that his administration would do what it can to keep centers of learning safe for students.There's more about praying for the victims and the families, extending sympathy, as well as reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind law, but not a word from the president about guns. I'm thinking the activist must have been wrong. But is there any way to be sure -- to be absolutely sure -- about anything? Unless I had the text of Bush's radio address, how can I declare with 100% confidence what Bush did not say? Another problem is that not everything makes it into the paper, and not everything in the paper makes it into the web site. For example, this Wednesday, Philadelphia (like a lot of other cities) is celebrating National Coming Out Day. The front page of the local section has a picture showing what vaguely appear to be same sex couples dancing, and of the master of ceremonies dancing around in a funny hat. A large headline in the center of the page proclaims "A block party full of pride" and there's a short writeup about Philly Pride's OutFest: Philly Pride says its OutFest celebration has grown over the last 13 years into the lagest national Coming Out Day (officially, it's Wednesday) celebration in the world. Yesterday's event, on 12th and 13th Streets, between Walnut and Pine, featured outdoor cafes; more than 50 vendors and local merchants selling their wares; singing and dancing contests and demonstrations; local groups networking; and plenty more.You'd think that with a list like that, there'd be some mention of the basic theme of the OutFest event. I mean, I happen to know, but not every Philadelphian does, and how would an ordinary reader know from reading the piece? What's all this "Pride" about? And what's an "OutFest"? Why the mystery? Were I a conspiratorially-minded type, I might think it had something to do with not wanting the little people (you know, readers who skip to the sports page) to know what "National Coming Out Day" means. I figured I must have missed the main piece, so I entered "National Coming Out Day" on the Inky's search engine. Nothing came To be sure, Philly Pride has a nice web site, but the only mention of them or the Outfest was in a small paragraph at the bottom of a weekend events column in the magazine supplement to the Friday paper. I missed it and I missed the event, which is a shame because I was in Philadelphia yesterday and had I known, I might have gone. Not that I care one way or another about National Coming Out Day, but it's certainly a big deal from the activists' standpoint, and has been for years. At the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), however, there's only a bare mention of it (in a link to the snapshots page) on the front page of the main website, which seems very, very odd. It's so subdued you'd miss it unless you scoured. I thought it would be a blazing headline, although I did find a page about last year's event. If you click on last year's "more," it takes you to this year's theme -- "HRC LAUNCHES RE-IMAGINED COMING OUT PROJECT AND 2005 THEME -- 'TALK ABOUT IT'." (I'm sorry folks, but re-imagining last year's theme just doesn't sound terribly innovative. Why is it buried almost as an afterthought instead of being on the front page?) There's a history of October 11 here, but this year's description was not easy to find. Am I going crazy, or is "National Coming Out Day" being kept in the closet? What gives? I thought "coming out" was the whole idea. (There are plenty of local events, but you'd think there'd be more national interest.) posted by Eric on 10.09.06 at 08:25 AM
Comments
You know, my father often tells me stories of his childhood where he and his innumberable brothers would bring their guns and gear to school so that they could go out hunting after class was over. There they would sit in the coat-room, rows of shotguns (duck) or rifles (deer) and not a soul to confiscate them. Simpler times or just more rational people? mdmhvonpa · October 9, 2006 01:20 PM The text of the Presidents radio address http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/10/20061007.html Ric · October 9, 2006 01:40 PM Milwaukee has an event, equivalant to OutFest, called Pride Fest. It is held at the same festival site as Irish Fest, German Fest and Festa Italiana, which presumeably aren't pride fests. triticale · October 11, 2006 10:32 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Not to be conspiratorially minded myself, but undermining the Prez's support for armament even if only through rumor would be sufficient strategy for weakening Republican turnout.
Of course, if the president makes teachers all carry shotguns, it will kind of turn that thing back.
That would be the day! That's my America. :P