|
October 20, 2006
Misteaks explaned hear!
I may suffer from a hypersensitive imagination, but when I see a headline like this the first thing in the morning, I don't know whether to question my sanity, or question authority:
That made no sense. But I still had this lingering worry that I might be ignorant, and that there might a secondary meaning of the verb "plane" which involved putting something on a plane. (I mean, after all, you can ship things, and you can truck things around; maybe we've been able to plane things all along and I just never paid attention.) But when I'm lucky, my imagination is tempered by common sense. Even if there is such a secondary meaning of "plane," it's not in common use, and straining to read obscure secondary meanings into things that are probably simple mistakes violates not only common sense, but also the well established maxim that it's never a good idea to attribute to design what can best be explained by stupidity or human error. So, after my imagination calmed down and my common sense dictated to me that this had to be a typo, I still had to read the article, because typos don't usually appear in headlines. When I clicked on the headline, the word "planing" also appeared on top on the headline of the actual story, but in the text the word "planning" was spelled correctly: North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, meanwhile, was reported to have told a visiting Chinese delegation that the communist nation wasn't planning more nuclear tests.That's a releaf. No biggie. Everyone makes misteaks. Far be it from me to complane. MORE: This planing business is worse than I thought, and it's spreading! Not only that, I don't think it's Yahoo's fault. I just performed a Google news search on the word "planing" and while Google's robot knows I'm wrong and suggests "planning" instead, there are 287 stories about "planing." The AP story has been regurgitated without any correction by the Washington Post, the Guardian, Forbes, the Prescott Herald, the Niagara Gazette, the Spokesman Review and others. I think the problem lies with the Associated Press. (I hope they're not planing anything for the election.) MORE: To its credit, the Washington Post has corrected the headline's spelling! But as of 8:35 a.m., the Guardian, the Prescott Herald, Forbes, the Niagara Gazette, and the Spokesman Review have not. Now I'm really curious. Should we assume that this is all automated? Or should we assume that only the WaPo employs editors who read the headlines? Why did only the Post get it right? The reason I'm stumped is that Google News obviously caught the error. And there is a thing called Spell Check.... So maybe it's unfair to blame robots. MORE: It occurs to me that because AP reports are syndicated, there might be contractual obligations to use them as they are, or not use them at all. Thus, it might not be permissible to correct them (which would mean the WaPo may be breaking the rules.) Does anyone know? AND MORE: Kim Jong Il has explained that the nuclear test was itself a mistake, and has offered as an explanation the fact that he was molested as child: (2006-10-21) -- North Korean President Kim Jong-Il today reportedly told Chinese diplomats that he regrets his government's recent detonation of a nuclear device, and he revealed that he had been molested as a child.I knew I'd find an explanation for this mess! If we follow out this logic, it becomes clear that what happened to President Kim as a child is responsible for the entire chain of events which led to the misspelling in question. (It's a classic example of the old " MORE: Might planing have a future anyway? There are over 20,000 entries for "urban planing" 17,000 for "planing commission" and 700 for "planing department," so it might be a good idea to plane ahead! On the other hand, perhaps I should "stop complaning." MORE (10/22/06): Much as I hate to belabor the point, I forgot all about "family planing," which seems to be mostly a generalized process involving abortions, vasectomies, tubal ligations, etc. Hmmm.... While the word "planning" is suggested as a Google alternative, since the goal seems to be along the lines of preventing human reproduction rather than enabling it, in this context it seems that "planing" might actually be a better word than "planning." posted by Eric on 10.20.06 at 07:50 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
One the words that most annoys me is 'preplanning'. There is no such thing as 'preplanning'. The concept is ridiculous. There is only 'planning'. However, it seems like no one 'plans' a funeral or a wedding anymore, they 'preplan' it.
Folks - you can't 'preplan' a wedding or a funeral. You can only 'plan' it.