Foley does Philly. Clinton does benefit.

Well, that didn't take long.

Today's Philadelphia Inquirer features a front page story -- headlined "Official vouched for sex offender" -- which I think is a perfect example of more to come:

Republican State Rep. Eugene McGill urged a judge in 2003 to show leniency for a friend who sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl and was later labeled a violent predator by the court.

The sixth-term Montgomery County incumbent defended a letter he wrote on behalf of Sheldon Granor - a man he called a "pillar of the community" - who developed a relationship with the teen over the Internet.

[...]

"I don't condone what people do," McGill said in an interview last week. "I write letters on the behalf of people I have personal knowledge of. I have done it before. I will do it again."

The victim, now 22, said she was offended by McGill's action and believed it suggested he had sought to protect a pedophile over his victim.

"I'm outraged, floored, livid," she said in an interview yesterday arranged at The Inquirer's request by the case's prosecutor. The Inquirer's policy is not to publish names of alleged sexual assault victims without their consent.

The disclosure of the letter comes while House Republican leaders in Washington are being questioned for how they dealt with the issue of protecting teens from predators. McGill's Democratic opponent said the letter was an example of how McGill is unfit for public office.

It's obvious what the issue is here.

Republicans support perversion!

Didn't you know?

Also in today's Inquirer is an article about Bill Clinton's Philadelphia visit. It was disappointing to read that his main event was "closed to the press":

Clinton, who turned 60 in August, raised an undisclosed sum for Casey in an event closed to the press. He also campaigned for Democrat Joe Sestak, who is trying to unseat U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon, and U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah, who is debating a run for Philadelphia mayor.

"The one thing I made a very determined decision about, even before I got sick" - with heart disease in 2004 - "was that I would not leave the White House and spend the rest of my life wishing I were still president," Clinton said in a recent New Yorker profile.

I'm almost tempted to say "careful what you don't wish for," but it might be taken the wrong way, and I'm probably taking his statement the wrong way. But I'd like to know whether there was any discussion of Mark Foley at the Bob Casey event, because I'd like to know whether they're going to go with my idea* of picturing Santorum and Foley together in a hit piece.

"Closed to the press."

Sheesh.

(Any idea whether they're including bloggers in that definition?)

I hate local news!


*Much as I'd love to copyright the idea, so I could make some money out of it, I'm afraid ideas enjoy no such protection.

MORE: In addition to the cowering over the Foley scandal, many Republicans seem ashamed of their own president.

Doesn't sound like a winning strategy, but I could be wrong.

posted by Eric on 10.06.06 at 12:54 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/4096






Comments

Are you suggesting that Republicans should be proud of their president?

For what? Torture? Spying on citizens? Sustaining our involvement in a lost cause like Iraq?

Quick: Name 3 things Bush has done this quarter that you are proud of.

Anonymous   ·  October 7, 2006 01:11 AM

Anony

What torture? What spying?

Do you read anything other than what Markos emails you?

I'm proud that my President's tax cuts have generated record levels of revenues, that the unemployment rate is below 5%, that the stock market is reaching record levels NOT based on fictious dot coms, that inflation is still being kept in control, that the economy is still growing, that specific legislation for military commissions to try unlawful belligerents has passed, that no Islamist terrorist attack on the continental US has taken place since 9/11 ...

I have my disagreements with my President on specific policies -- ie illegal immigration and the expansion of the welfare state, but on the whole and looking at the creeping dhimmitude in the face of radical Islam in France, Germany and the Netherlands, I'm satisfied.

AND additionally looking at the so-called Dem leaders like Rangel, Pelosi and Murtha, just waiting to reimpose taxes on the poor and middleclass, wreck the economy and piss on the US military and wholly unserious about Islamist terrorism, I'll vote Republican regardless of my issues with my party.

Let me know when the Democratic party takes issues seriously again.

Darleen   ·  October 8, 2006 01:41 PM

Anonymous posters; anonymous accusers; if I were a leftist I'd suggest a connection between the two. :)

InRussetShadows   ·  October 8, 2006 02:33 PM


March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits