|
September 22, 2006
We're here to help you!
I found the following signs posted in a Daily Mail article about so-called "viral emails":
But the second one strikes me as downright possible. That's because an ever-growing number of activist bureaucrats believe that the remedy for traffic congestion is to actually encourage congestion, as a disincentive to drive at all: ...increased traffic capacity causes people to drive more--a lot more--such that half of any driving-time savings generated by new roadways are lost in the short run.Lest anyone think I am making this up, it started in Berkeley, and is now spreading like a virus -- even infecting red states like North Carolina: Traffic calming advocates intend only to use these measures in a manner destructive to automobiles. This is because of the "Living Streets" philosophy which believes that automobiles violate the streets, owned exclusively by pedestrians. A similar philosophy is based on the book "Livable Streets" written by Donald Appleyard (1928-1982), a professor of urban planning at the University of California-Berkeley. Appleyard's plan called for recruiting activists named stakeholders to sell traffic calming to unsuspecting neighbors on "streets where residents requested help to reduce speeding and accidents" (2). After the neighborhood streets are calmed, the techniques are applied to busy corridor streets, leading to traffic congestion madness and eventually the ultimate goal of calmers: create cities completely free of automobiles, leaving walking, cycling, and government-controlled mass transit as the only means of transportation.The resultant economic chaos will undoubtedly create millions more jobs for the bureaucracy, because government-created problems demand government-created solutions. Because bureaucratic "solutions" can be depended on to make bureaucratically-created problems worse, it is always in the interest of bureaucracies to create problems. But only in the name of solving them. With any luck, no one will suspect that a slogan like "traffic calming" is actually as much of an oxymoron as "Consumer Advocate." (I'm sure the latter can be depended on to advocate relentlessly on behalf of the former. If you don't like it, pray.) posted by Eric on 09.22.06 at 11:38 AM
Comments
Eric: Write me; I was an intern at Penn and now am an ophthalmologist. I spent 2 months with your Dad in1965, and was out to your house in ?ardmore? for the annual party several years and watched you swim in your pool. What are you doing now?
frank grady · September 23, 2006 01:29 AM Frank, welcome! That goes a long way back, as my dad sold the house in the early 1970s and moved downtown, and I don't remember 1965 specifically. But I fondly remember the parties. Thanks for visiting. (I'll send you an email.) Eric Scheie · September 23, 2006 07:40 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Is there any chance they've openend that lane to traffic going the other way?
If not... 'tard.