![]() |
|
![]()
September 11, 2006
A serious classicist
Pajamas Media made a major announcement today, and while I already wrote about it in an update to my earlier 9/11 post, I'm just so plussed about the fact that Victor Davis Hanson is now blogging for Pajamas Media that I wanted to make sure everyone knows. Hanson is a genuine classical scholar of the sort I wish I could have been, and his knowledge of history is what makes his blog such a pleasure to read. Here he looks at the Iraq War from a historical perspective: ...[H]ere we are, 5 years after 9/11 without another attack, and struggling democracies fighting terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq.This blog is called "Classical Values" for a lot of different reasons, some serious, some tongue in cheek. But the only classical scholar here is co-blogger Dennis; I have never laid claim to being such a thing. Victor Davis Hanson is the real deal (Dennis describes him an "eminent classicist and historian of ancient warfare"). So much so that he's a legend. Seriously, I'm honored just to be blogging for the same outfit. UPDATE (11:00 p.m.): I just watched Part II of "The Path to 9/11" (not bad, IMO) which was interrupted by the president's speech. I thought it sounded positively Hanson-like: Across the broader Middle East, the extremists are fighting to prevent such a future. Yet America has confronted evil before, and we have defeated it _ sometimes at the cost of thousands of good men in a single battle. When Franklin Roosevelt vowed to defeat two enemies across two oceans, he could not have foreseen D-Day and Iwo Jima _ but he would not have been surprised at the outcome. When Harry Truman promised American support for free peoples resisting Soviet aggression, he could not have foreseen the rise of the Berlin Wall _ but he would not have been surprised to see it brought down. Throughout our history, America has seen liberty challenged _ and every time, we have seen liberty triumph with sacrifice and determination. posted by Eric on 09.11.06 at 06:38 PM
Comments
I already expressed my concerns about the factual problems. http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/004014.html I thought as TV entertainment goes, it was not bad. I don't blame Clinton or Bush specifically for 9/11, any more than I'd blame FDR for Pearl Harbor. Eric Scheie · September 12, 2006 10:35 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I hope you're aware that that "not bad" 9/11 show is a pack of lies designed to blame Clinton for 9/11 while pretending Bush did nothing wrong. The show is so poisoned with made-up characters and events that even "conservatives" like Bill O'Reilly are admitting it's crap. A date that will live in infamy does not deserve to be commemorated with more infamy.