It must just kill Reuters to have to give credit to blogs. (Although, of course, the news agency repeats its photographer's assertion that the cloned smoke resulted from the removal of "dust marks" -- a claim that reminded Jeff Goldstein of the time he "created five new DVD players" simply by dusting!)
“Every once in a while you want to tell yourself that media bias is accidental and not deliberate, a sort of “they can’t help themselves” phenomenon. This is NOT one of those times.”
They'll dutifully hang this Adnan Hajj out to dry, but I think he's as replaceable as a piston.
I think it's part of a deeply institutionalized, pro-Islamist culture at Reuters. Anti-Israel bias is OK as long as it's disguised, and can be passed off as objective journalism. If one of these guys is caught red-handed, Reuters will pull the offending item immediately, then claim that they've "investigated" and "corrected" the problem.
It almost reminds me of Capitol Hill Blue, except that Reuters can't be dismissed out of hand as an unreliable news source.
No wonder bloggers are so hated.
MORE: In a major exclusive, IMAO's Frank J. has an amazing picture showing the shocking devastation caused by an errant Israeli rocket which struck Disney World! And even if it didn't, it might as well have!
posted by Eric on 08.06.06 at 10:27 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/3912
Comments
You think the anti-Israel bias in Britain is confined to Reuters? After the Suez fiasco in 1956 Whitehall became solidly pro-Arabist.
Captain Ned · August 7, 2006 01:44 AM
Sadly, it's true.
Without the internet, where would we be regarding the news? Its like our own RFE...
You think the anti-Israel bias in Britain is confined to Reuters? After the Suez fiasco in 1956 Whitehall became solidly pro-Arabist.