|
April 03, 2006
Of monitors and men
Drudge has linked to a story about a kooky professor named Eric R. Pianka, who believes that for the good of the planet, 90% of the world's human population should disappear: Though his statements are admittedly bold, he's not without abundant advocates. But what may set this revered biologist apart from other doomsday soothsayers is this: Humanity's collapse is a notion he embraces.Hahaha! I see it now! Death is certainly interesting, and as someone who's watched dozens of my friends die, I'm probably ahead of the learning curve. (Pianka proudly features his own obituary at his web site.) Pianka will doubtless be vilified as a genocide advocate. That's as it should be, for even though he denies advocating direct action, he's clearly sympathetic to the idea. "Good terrorists would be taking [Ebola Roaston and Ebola Zaire] so that they had microbes they could let loose on the Earth that would kill 90 percent of people."While there's a lot of debate as to whether this man should be receiving the high academic honors he is receiving, it would be a mistake to write off his thinking as the work of a lone nut. Along with Ted Kaczynski and John Zerzan, he's just another in a fairly long line of such radical Luddite anarcho-primitivist thinkers. I've called them "anti-civilizationists" and it's obvious that their ranks are growing. Radical Islam is mild by comparison. Redstate's Nick Firenze is correct in seeing Pianka as a threat because of the likelihood that he'll inspire others: Hopefully, none of the students impressed by Dr. Pianka's ideas will try to act on those ideas.Good point. It would be tough to find a better case for government surveillance. The bright side is that people like Pianka can be watched, as can their students. The ones who are fired, denied tenure, driven underground are probably the most likely suspects. Not that I have any problem with anyone's free speech. Pianka and those of similar bent have just as much right to advocate genocide as Nazis or anyone else. But common sense suggests that advocates of genocide bear watching. (Monitoring?) Pianka isn't too hard to spot. Here are a couple of lovely pictures from his web site:
What a pity that this jerk has to be a herpetologist, of all things! I've been an amateur herpetologist for most of my life, and I love snakes and monitors. I think Pianka is giving reptile lovers a bad name!
I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola.Concludes Mims: Let me now remove my reporter's hat for a moment and tell you what I think. We live in dangerous times. The national security of many countries is at risk. Science has become tainted by highly publicized cases of misconduct and fraud.To those who might see racist overtones (because Ebola is "found only in Central Africa"), Pianka offers a reassurance that "Ebola does not discriminate, kills everyone and could spread to Europe and the the Americas." What a relief to know the man isn't a bigot! UPDATE: Pajamas Media has more links on the Pianka story. UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds looks at whether depression might be involved, and wonders whether cases like Pianka's receive disproportionate media attention. Given that academics' lives are generally pretty good, it's hard to see why academics should be more depressed. It's perhaps better to say that academics' negative statements get more media attention.That's because they're in a profession that tends to act as a sort of contagion. And when the contagion advocates contagion, well, that's bound to attract attention. What I'd like to know is whether Pianka is on the "right" or on the "left." I mean, I hate to see everything get politicized, but exactly where would killing 90% of humanity fit on the political spectrum anyway? UPDATE (03/06/06): Professor Pianka will be interviewed by the FBI, and he denies advocating genocide, and he may be right. Promulgating an idea or a philosophy is not the same thing as advocating its direct implementation, even if the one who promulgates in wants it to happen. But suppose instead of "people," he'd said "Jews": "Good terrorists would be taking [Ebola Roaston and Ebola Zaire] so that they had microbes they could let loose on the Earth that would kill 90 percent of Jews."Or substitute "Christians," "Negroes," or "homosexuals." Is humanity as a whole less worthy of protection than individual groups? posted by Eric on 04.03.06 at 08:17 AM
Comments
I'm inspired ... to get my beard trimmed. I don't want to be mistaken for him. Joseph Hertzlinger · April 3, 2006 06:43 PM It has occurred to me that I would like to see a blow-by-blow scenario written up for exactly WHAT would happen were such a strain of Ebola to be released. (For the maximum number of 90% to be reached, we must assume that draconian quarantine procedures are not followed, and that the internet is entirely cut off.) I hear they've got some nifty epidemic tracking software at the NIH. Why? Because I want it clearly evident to these dopes that when 90% of the population dies in a horribly traumatic manner, life as they know it *ceases to exist.* Live in a city? You may well be screwed. Do you know where to head, how to gather food, how to protect yourself from predators both four and two legged? Really? Oh, and did you remember to store your food properly? Winter's long when there's no heat. Heck, even a read of a fiction such as "The Stand," which has an oddly optimistic ending in regards to civilization would give a little perspective. He talks about the "second wave" of deaths— those who survived the superflu but who died because they couldn't survive the aftermath— and that is a very telling comment, because most folk don't have the means to survive wild, even if they think they do. Ever hear the phrase, "Those who died were the lucky ones"? Don't know if I've ever heard it outside of fiction, but boy, it would probably apply in such a situation... B. Durbin · April 3, 2006 10:33 PM I know 9 people who I would never miss. bird dog · April 4, 2006 01:46 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Wasn't this essentially the plot of the movie "Twelve Monkeys"?