This makes it very tough for bloggers like me who might otherwise defend them against the use of copyright laws to thwart the free flow of information:
The WAN, which represents 18,000 newspapers and 73 national newspaper associations, said it would examine whether new standards and policies could be drafted to create a commercial relationship between publishers, search engines and content aggregators.
Mr O’Reilly singled out Google for criticism, saying: “As a general rule, Yahoo, MSN and Ask Jeeves seem more open to constructive dialogue. It’s only Google which seems to have this absolute view [that all information should be available for free].” Google could not immediately be reached for comment.
Mr O’Reilly likened the initiative to the conflict between the music industry and illegal file-sharing websites and said it was not a sign that publishers had failed to create a competitive online business model of their own.
The irony is that I'm sympathetic to Google's "absolute view" and I think the this country's founders would be too.
Google, unfortunately, does not extend its "absolutist" thinking to countries like China.
Which means they'll have fewer and fewer defenders.