|
February 10, 2006
Huzzah !
James Kunstler has repaired his archives! The Krispy Kremer werewolf quote is restored to all its former glory... September 19, 2005 And glad it is that I am to see it. My faith in his punditly integrity, weakened nigh unto death, waxes strong again. So what's he been chatting up lately? Anything new and noteworthy? Nah. But, ignoring the content, there's an interesting increase in the stridency of his tone. Here, let's look at a brief, de-contextualized excerpt from January 23rd... Now, why on earth would Mr. Reich believe that China can possibly keep behaving the way it does for another two or three decades?... Peckerhead, eh? More later, but first let me point to the crux of my disagreement with the Kunstlerian Vision... Nor will anybody come up with a miracle technological rescue remedy to keep all the motors humming. I believe that they will. Almost all of my disagreement with the man flows from that particular example among his many other unsupported assertions. Here's a slightly different version of his hellfire and brimstone schtick... No combination of alternative fuels will allow us to run American life the way we have been used to running it...The wonders of steady technological progress achieved through the reign of cheap oil have lulled us into a kind of Jiminy Cricket syndrome, leading many Americans to believe that anything we wish for hard enough will come true... Wishing has nothing to do with it. It'll take brains, money, and gut-busting hard work, as ever. Wishful notions about rescuing our way of life with "renewables" are also unrealistic. Solar-electric systems and wind turbines face not only the enormous problem of scale but the fact that the components require substantial amounts of energy to manufacture... and the probability that they can't be manufactured at all without the underlying support platform of a fossil-fuel economy... What do industry representatives have to say about that? Danish turbine manufacturer Vestas undertook a life cycle assessment of their latest wind turbine...according to their research...one of the company’s V90, 3.0 MW offshore wind turbines has to generate electricity for approximately 6.8 months before it produces as much energy as is used during the manufacturing lifetime. This, they say, means the turbine model earns its own worth more than 35 times during its energy production lifetime. Lousy Danes. Somebody get Mr. Kunstler a fact checker, stat. We will surely use solar and wind technology to generate some electricity for a period ahead but probably at a very local and small scale. That conclusion is not so clear cut as he would have you believe... "It is better to use various inputs to grow corn and make ethanol and use that in your cars than it is to use the gasoline and fossil fuels directly," said Kammen, who is co-director of the Berkeley Institute of the Environment and UC Berkeley's Class of 1935 Distinguished Chair of Energy. Clearly not a reliable source. Back to Kunstler... ...you might as well just burn the inputs and not bother with the biomass products. And the Berkeley Boffins say? "The people who are saying ethanol is bad are just plain wrong,"..."But it isn't a huge victory - you wouldn't go out and rebuild our economy around corn-based ethanol." Hopelessly unworldly academics that they are, you just want to chuck them under the chin and tranquilize them with milk and cookies. Kunstler, on the other hand, is a worldly, wisecracking, shoot-from-the-hip kind of guy. College audiences love him. In terms of presentation, imagine Bruce Sterling with an impaired IQ and mild Tourette's. Sure, he may not have all his facts straight. But then, facts are for losers. What he has (with apologies to Stephen Malcolm Anderson), is style. Too bad I'm immune. He just irritates me. If you're looking for an antidote to his clownish melancholy, try Green Car Congress. I would challenge anyone to scroll through their archives and not notice that a lot of unwatched pots are starting to boil. Here, check out December, January and February. Or check out The Energy Blog. Delve into their blogrolls and banish those doomsday blues. I suppose that's well and good, but saved or not, I don't want to leave you on such a mundane note. Coal power. Huh. Dirty, dangerous, archaic...I'd been hoping for fusion generators. Let's look at a couple of blue sky concepts, notions with some zip. The first one has been floating around the blogosphere for a few weeks now, but you might have missed it. It's a tethered airship/wind turbine/pinwheel thingy. Floating hundreds to thousands of feet overhead, as the wind blows the device rotates, generates power at its hubs, and sends the resultant electricity down the tether cable to you, the consumer. Sure, there's no prototype. Sure, at this stage it's all just pixelware. But the audacity of the notion can't help but earn my admiration. Thinking outside the box, I believe they call it. What an imagination... Treehugger has an interview with the inventor, and I really hope his clever idea can take flight. Next up is a notion that I was initially reluctant to mention. Being a liberal arts major, I have only the dimmest comprehension of the laws of physics. F equals mA? Whatever. What I do remember from my long ago high school classes can't help me much with this one. It seems counterintuitive, to say the least. The developers call their notion "Atmospheric Cold Megawatts" and I shall quote liberally from their website... ACM is a system for the generation of energy based upon differences in the atmospheric pressure at geographically spaced sites, and comprises at least one long conduit - in the order of many miles long. Dear sweet Jesus. This one really blindsided me. No fuel is required or consumed to produce the power. No pollutants are introduced into the atmosphere as the result of the generation process. The cost per KWh is a fraction of traditional (and alternative) generation methods. Because there are few moving parts, maintenance costs are minimal and the projected lifespan of installations is considerably longer than any other generation method. Yikes. It's like cold fusion, but without the fusion. Modestly sized pipelines that, instead of transporting oil or natural gas for eventual combustion, transport nothing but thin air. But is it too good to be true? Here's their patent (pdf). I've thought about this for awhile now, and I'm coming around to the point where I think it might work. I had to sidle up to it crabwise, with frequent rest stops. First, it's not perpetual motion, no more than a windmill or a waterwheel is. There's a moving fluid or gas energized by the sun, and the machine just extracts some energy from it in passing. Consider a breezeway as a humble example. As wind is channeled through the space between two buildings, it picks up speed. Very refreshing on a hot, muggy day. If you've ever walked through a big city on a breezy day, you may have noticed the same phenomenon on a larger scale. The skyscrapers can channel and focus a fairly innocuous zephyr until it's downright blustery. The effect is often local, and sharply delineated. This pipeline business seems to be a similar effect. Why wouldn't air flow from a high pressure zone to a low pressure zone? It does it every day. What's clever is the notion of trapping and channelling it (as in a breezeway) but then continuing to taper the channels so as to increase the wind velocity even further. From a wiki article on the company... Anyone who has seen a weather report has seen maps with high pressure systems on one part of the map, marked by a large, bold H; and a low pressure systems on another part of the map, marked with a large, bold L. Between these pressure systems, there are the isobars – those wavy white lines that lie across the space between the two different pressure zones, indicating equal amounts of pressure, which create a pressure gradient (hill) that allows wind to flow naturally from high pressure to low pressure. So, why am I still uneasy? With two to three decades of data from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) at their disposal, the company has run analyses over a number of different locations, and with the help of interns hopes to have modeling for two to three locations for most countries of the world soon... Okay... Time to come down from the clouds. To cushion our re-entry here are some parting thoughts from Mr. Kunstler, regarding the SOTU speech the other night... I hate to keep harping on this, but Mr. Bush could have announced a major effort to restore the American railroad system. It would have been a major political coup. It would have a huge impact on our oil use. The public would benefit from it tremendously. And it would have put thousands of people to work on something really meaningful. Unlike trips to Mars and experiments in cold fusion, railroads are something we already know how to do, and the tracks are lying out there waiting to be fixed. So it's public transit he's wanting then? Well, he need seek no further. Click on this link. Words don't do it justice, so just go have yourselves a look. Clearly, some people are powerfully moved by such possibilities, but I'm afraid I'm not one of them. The romance of rail never really clicked with me, being as I'm more of a giant airship man. I mean, as long as we're wishing... No matter how fancy the coach you're in, at whatever altitude, you'll still have to "Present your papers, please". Better even than airships, I'll take a flying car, thank you. posted by Justin on 02.10.06 at 08:27 AM
Comments
I prefer to leave him wherever he is, idly stroking his ocicats and dreaming of Dutch waffles with powdered sugar. J. Case · February 11, 2006 01:08 PM You know the sign of a good co-blogger? When you can be reading a person's piece and you aren't sure until you get to the end which author wrote it. Not because the two are clones of each other, but because the quality is there, the same elegance of wit and level of clarity. Justin, you write as well as Eric. That is high praise I hope you know. ;-) Dean Esmay · February 13, 2006 08:59 PM Dean, I always said Justin's a better writer than I am. And Justin, I think you brought Wolcott back to life! Oh Happy Day! Eric Scheie · February 13, 2006 11:19 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Nice work! Maybe you can bring James Wolcott back to life...