"Next, They Came for the Plastic Clowns" opined David Bernstein, joined by clown defender Glenn Reynolds.
Can we get serious?
I mean, shouldn't we be asking why the crowd is so upset at the clown? I didn't know what to think, and I was reduced to the status of a pitiful crybaby, asking questions like "Why do they hate us?"
I figured that either all clowns are Un-Islamic, or else Ronald McDonald is un-Islamic, and un-Islamic Clowns are bad. Or both.
Clearly we need to understand. There must be an explanation. A bit more research convinced me that there were other things leading up to this.
The link goes to stuff I don't understand, but which is obviously true. That's because people don't do these things without a reason!
Don't clowns bring the bad karma down on themselves by doing things like this?
As professor (and out of politeness I won't call him "perfesser") Juan Cole observes, Nazi tactics like the above (also known as "eliminationist rhetoric") are not funny.
The real issue, of course, is not whether a clown is plastic or not. It's what it does. And (as Mark Steyn revealed recently), some of the things that plastic clowns do are indeed shocking to contemplate.
"Hier klicken"? Is that fascist code talk for "Achtung baby"?
While I'm all for freedom and everything, I hope things don't have to come to this:
MORE: Sean Kinsell has a thoughtful post on the cartoon irreverency in which he touches on Egg McMuffins eaten with "exaggerated relish."
That definitely sounds like a religious affront -- as well as an affront to the senses. (For starters, relish doesn't belong on Egg McMuffins!)
UPDATE (02/21/06): Via Maggies Farm, the mystery of who benefits the most from these attacks on Ronald McDonald appears to have been solved:
I don't know why I'm so slow to figure these things out....
posted by Eric on 02.15.06 at 10:22 AM
Comments
"That definitely sounds like a religious affront -- as well as an affront to the senses. (For starters, relish doesn't belong on Egg McMuffins!)"
Har-har, honey. Actually, one weird thing: I was brought up in a Sabbatarian Christian religion in which we followed the Levitical health laws. After becoming an apostate I had no compunction about eating pork and shellfish and stuff...but my stomach wasn't used to them, and I couldn't keep them down. So now I guess I abstain from pork for irreligious reasons.
Anyway, I was going to use a Big Mac there, but it didn't sound as offensive as something with ham. Might have gone better with the relish, though.
"That definitely sounds like a religious affront -- as well as an affront to the senses. (For starters, relish doesn't belong on Egg McMuffins!)"
Har-har, honey. Actually, one weird thing: I was brought up in a Sabbatarian Christian religion in which we followed the Levitical health laws. After becoming an apostate I had no compunction about eating pork and shellfish and stuff...but my stomach wasn't used to them, and I couldn't keep them down. So now I guess I abstain from pork for irreligious reasons.
Anyway, I was going to use a Big Mac there, but it didn't sound as offensive as something with ham. Might have gone better with the relish, though.
(Thanks for the link, BTW.)