|
January 18, 2006
Undefended affluence?
The things I miss while I'm away.... If reports like this are correct, the United States is under invasion at the border -- not in the civilian sense by aliens from Mexico, but by the Mexican military. And the U.S. government is doing, well, basically nothing. Unless you consider warning the border patrol to stay out of the way to be doing something: The U.S. Border Patrol has warned agents in Arizona of incursions into the United States by Mexican soldiers "trained to escape, evade and counterambush" if detected -- a scenario Mexico denied yesterday.This is getting out of hand. I'm a libertarian and I do not accept any restrictions on constitutional freedoms of United States citizens, but keeping the border secure against invasion is so basic a function of government as to not require extensive comment. What the hell is the problem? While historically uninformed people often say that Rome fell because of things like sodomy, a very compelling case can be made that a major cause of the actual collapse (and subsequent sacking) of Rome was undefended borders. Arguably, Rome was no longer capable of defending its borders, because by the time of the barbarian invasions their military was in tatters. This is not true of the United States. Perhaps the failure to do anything can be attributed to denial. Mexico certainly denies any connection with the soldiers involved, (claiming instead that they're rich drug dealers dressed up to look like military): Rafael Laveaga, spokesman for the Mexican Embassy in Washington, denied that Mexican military personnel are crossing into the United States.Well, if the Mexican officials are right, then Mexico is not in control of its own border. Earlier in this century, border incursions by Mexican militia leader Pancho Villa (allegedly supported by Germany) were repelled by General Pershing, whose punitive campaign chased Villa's units back into Mexico. Because of political considerations, I seriously doubt the Bush administration will do anything like that, unless the Mexicans start shooting U.S. citizens. Interestingly enough, while I was in Nassau I was startled to discover (by reading, listening to talk radio and talking to locals) that the country has its own serious problem with illegal aliens. Mostly from impoverished Haiti, they come to the Bahamas do to the grunt work that affluent Bahamians no longer want to do. The prisons are full of Haitians; according to an account I read down there, Haitians make up a full 90% of the prison population. But for the Haitians, the Bahamas would be relatively free of crime. This stuff is not often disclosed to tourists (officially, it's a very sensitive issue), but anyone can turn on a radio or talk to ordinary citizens. Unlike the United States, where illegal aliens are recognizable, it's very difficult to tell who is Haitian unless you talk to them. Once I stopped to ask a man for directions, and he refused to answer, which is very uncharacteristic of Bahamians, who are invariably friendly to tourists, and who will go out of their way to help. I saw a look of fear flash across his face as he shook his head "No" and ran away from me, so I'm pretty sure he was an illegal Haitian. Illegal immigration is a mess all around. Miserable people love to leave their hellholes, and there's nothing more attractive than affluence. The ugly fact is that nobody wants to live in places like Haiti. Aside from a few cranks who believe in defending borders (often unfairly lumped in with ultra-nationalists, if not racists), I think affluent people tend not to care until their affluence itself is threatened. They forget history. posted by Eric on 01.18.06 at 07:52 AM
Comments
I stand corrected. (I guess I'm stuck in the last century....) Eric Scheie · January 18, 2006 12:22 PM Eric, I have been on the US border with Mexico (about 25 miles Southeast of El Paso, Texas). I spent a week out there recently. I can personally confirm that I have been within 100 feet of Mexican military along the Rio Grande (border). They were in Mexico and we were in the USA. They were right on the south bank.. which puts them 15 FEET from the border.. not exactly the mile that the Mexican embassy assures us they keep between themselves and the border.. I have video. Brian D. Kohl · January 18, 2006 01:14 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Eric, a tiny quibble: you mean earlier in the last century when it comes to Pancho Villa.