|
|
|
|
January 24, 2006
The things nice people do!
I see that a sickening Philadelphia story involving the apparently random, near fatal beating of a Haitian immigrant has reached the attention of Drudge, who links to this Breitbart report. The facts are appalling enough simply because of the cavalier nature of what was done: The Inquirer version reads differently, adding details about the victim's Haitian identity, and a discussion of whether this attack (which the police describe as "mind boggling") was a hate crime: Four University City High School students have been arrested on charges of randomly beating and nearly killing a Drexel University graduate student by shoving him into traffic in West Philadelphia - all the while videotaping the attack, police said yesterday.If the facts are as stated and the victim was singled out at random, I don't see how could it legally be a hate crime. For starters, where's the hate? It would be as if a sniper just started shooting at whomever came along. (Well, no it wouldn't be. Because snipers use guns, and we all know that guns are the actual cause of shootings.) What I find most appalling about this story is something that I keep seeing in reports involving horrendous crimes -- recitals that the accused criminals are actually good people. Breitbart quotes the mother of one of the accused: Osbourne's mother said he was an innocent bystander who happened to be nearby and caught on tape.Yes, she did tell the Inquirer that, and I suppose it's something that a mother would be expected to say. But the Inquirer also quotes teachers who say pretty much the same thing: Jeffrey Rosenberg, a health and physical education teacher at University City High and the teachers' union representative in the building, said one of those arrested was a student in his class.I don't know how to react to this. Should I take Mr. Rosenberg at his word that he had a "good rapport" with "these kids"? I mean, assume that he was scared to death of them. Would he tell the Inquirer that? The football coach of these is quoted as being "stunned" by the fact that a "nice young man" would do something like this: Ken Gritter, University City High's assistant basketball coach, said word of the arrests had already spread among basketball players yesterday when he heard about them from a reporter.I'm wondering if we'll ever know why nice people behave like criminals. Fortunately for law abiding firearms owners, there weren't any guns involved. (The word "children" seems to be reserved for occasions when a teenager gets shot.) Still, there's the lingering question of what would make nice people go out and do something like this. To make a video? Video. That must be it. I blame violent videos for video violence. Plus the easy availability and low cost of video equipment. posted by Eric on 01.24.06 at 01:07 PM
Comments
I would disagree that 18-24 year olds are inherently immature; I rather think it is the result of prolonged adolescence. Little more than a century ago, sixteen and seventeen year olds were given adult resposibilities and expected to act like adults and *gasp* they actually did. While they may have had a lot of emotional development left to do, they were expected to live up to the consequences of their actions. We now have a culture in which a certain level of irresponsibility and immaturity is expected in ADULTS, and then are surprised when those who are not yet considered adult behave in an irresponsible manner. Quelle suprise, they don't handle boredom well. Don't "keep them busy," give them responsibilities and make sure they live up to them. (If you've been preparing them for adult life all of their lives, they will be capable of handling responsibilities... well, RESPONSIBLY.) B. Durbin · January 24, 2006 10:29 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It was adolescence. Adolescence caused the violence.
Or, rather, the lack of insight and foresight attendent upon adolescence coupled with the every present testosterone intoxication found in most any teenaged boy.
In short, you are dealing with children. Bloody irresponsible children. We proceed under the assumption that teens can be left to their own devices, when practical experience shows we need to keep them occupied. Gainfully employed as it were. You have to keep them too busy to get into trouble.
And this includes children 18-24, for they too lack the maturity found in adults. Even a college grad needs to be supervised 24/7, for even he tends to be impulsive and irresponsible without adult oversight.
A paradigm shift in how we see late adolescencts and pre-adults is long overdue.