|
December 28, 2005
Toys 'Я' worse than Communism and murder?
What is art? What is speech? What is offensive speech? Such questions leaped from the front page of today's Philadelphia Inquirer in an article about Sony's "Playstation kid" graffiti advertising campaign. Local activists who favor political murals but hate corporate ones are in a dither: Sony has conceded that the graffiti ads are not spontaneous art, but contrived marketing for the handheld games.I know it's a simplistic question, but I'd like to know why a permit would be required for a Playstation kid, but not for Che Guevara, Rachel Corrie, or Tookie Williams? (In many cities, even building owners are prohibited from painting over what's called "mural art.") Is the current uproar over the fact that someone wants to make money, and that's bad? Unlike the case of regular graffiti art, Sony is paying the owners of buildings to allow the art, and some of them like it. (A fact which appears not to matter at all.) It strikes me that there is a serious philosophical question somewhere in all of this. Dare I ask whether this question involves morality? Commercial graffiti is more immoral than graffiti glorifying murderers? New York blogger (and "street-art aficionado") Jake Dobkin does not like Sony's Playstation graffiti (to say the least): I've written about this so many times on Gothamist that I'm worried about sounding like a broken record-- but apparently the big corporations have not gotten the message. This week, Sony Playstation graffiti pieces have been popping up like cancer all over Manhattan. The pieces are sometimes drawn by hand-- others are wheat pasted to walls all over SoHo and NoLIta. It's clearly a large campaign, and deserves a thoughtful, measured response. Here's mine: corporate graffiti sucks. Sucks! Sucks! Sucks! It sucks for a variety of specific reasons....He lists the reasons why it sucks (exploitive, fake, deceptive, illegal, hated by neighbors, bad PR, etc.), and I think he has some good points. He also provides a photo of Sony's sucky-ass art: I have to admit, I don't especially like Sony's graffiti art, but I think there's a huge double standard which isn't being acknowledged. Forgetting for a moment First Amendment concerns, I'd like to ask why there should be more of a moral right to deface buildings with pictures of a communist murderer than with pictures of the Playstation kids. For example, Mr. Dobkin links to some of his own art, which features a picture of Che Guevara surrounded by BB King, Ernest Hemingway, and others. Many people wouldn't mind seeing Che Guevara, but many would. (I know it's just my own personal opinion, but may I be so bold as to venture that Communism sucks?) While I'm not especially offended by Dobkin's work (because he's at least kind enough to also feature images of people I do like), here's an example (by another artist) which typifies the type of mural I don't like: Again, why does the fact that this is not commercial make the above morally superior? Is it less offensive because it doesn't advertise a product? Isn't it advertising Communism and murder? Aren't Communism and murder at least as offensive as high tech toys? Well, no! That's because making money is immoral. Committing murder in the name of "social justice" is not. Whether anyone likes it or not, moral questions are won by those who scream the loudest. (What, you're expecting I should scream more loudly? On behalf of the DRM-virus-spreading Sony?) UPDATE (12/29/05): Yahoo has picked up the story, and links to a photo of Sony's actual Philadelphia, um, art. The owner likes it, but the City says he has to get a license because he violates "zoning" or something. (And of course, commies get to advertise free.) Go figure. posted by Eric on 12.28.05 at 07:55 AM
Comments
Sacrilege! Eric Scheie · December 28, 2005 12:05 PM If you go into older cities and lo0k at the sides of buildings you'll often see faded painted ads from the 30s, 40s, 50s, etc. on the sides of buildings. It's neat to see such things making a comeback. lindenen · December 28, 2005 11:32 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
What if Sony changed it to having Che holding the PSP?