Is there "implicit racism" in King Kong? According to David Edelstein, there is. And here's "the implication":
Kong stands for the black man brought in chains from a dark island...
I never knew.
Seriously, this is the first I've heard about the racism of King Kong. But according to Baldilocks, "only a racist would automatically think of race*whenever* monkeys are mentioned." John Hawkins has more on this old, rather tired strategy of finding hidden racism in the most innocuous (and humorous) discussions of simians.
At the risk of asking a serious question, though, if "monkey" is a racist slur, is it fair to ask which race is being targeted? As Larry Elder points out, the term is often used by radical Muslims to describe Jews. Does that mean the racism implicit in "King Kong" might be anti-Jewish? How are we to know?
I'm confused.
And what about the term "ReCHIMPlican" (and likening Bush to a chimp)? Is that racism too?
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/3132
Comments
For crying out loud. Why is it always a giant ape! Show some diversity here! What about the 'Tangs, Chimps and Baboons! They could do this part just as well, if not better. Bigotry I tell you.
But Groucho Marx got in big trouble for saying (to a female contestant who'd just told him she had 16 kids), "I like my cigar, but I take it out of my mouth occasionally!"
One website (http://www.cinematical.com/2005/12/15/king-kong-the-inevitable-race-beastiality-questions-begin/) jokingly questions whether the real issue isn't racism, but beastiality.
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Don?t bang your head!
For crying out loud. Why is it always a giant ape! Show some diversity here! What about the 'Tangs, Chimps and Baboons! They could do this part just as well, if not better. Bigotry I tell you.