|
|
|
|
December 15, 2005
Not in vain!
Today's historic election in Iraq celebrates freedom and democracy in the truest sense. While I'm very happy for the Iraqi people, I think this election is good news for Americans so accustomed to hearing that our troops died in vain. They absolutely did not. Via Glenn Reynolds and Black Five, my attention was drawn to an Iraqi blogger named Alaa who wrote this in THE MESOPOTAMIAN back in January: My condolences to the Great American people for the tragic recent losses of soldiers. The blood of Iraqis and Americans is being shed on the soil of Mesopotamia; a baptism with blood. A baptism of a lasting friendship and alliance, for many years to come, through thick and thin, we shall never forget the brave soldiers fallen while defending our freedom and future.Today proved that this blood was worth shedding, and it's deeply moving to see the results. As for the results, Glenn Reynolds has a great collection of links. A turnout of up to 84% according to Pajamas Media: More and more people are going to the polling centers and the turnout levels have exceeded 84% in some centers.If that happened in the United States, it would be considered the dawn of a new era. Well, even though it happened in Iraq, it is the dawn of a new era, and the only tragic aspect of it is that so many Americans are unable to appreciate the good their country has done. Tom Smith from an American soldier: Though bracing for any vote-disrupting violence, U.S. troops in Iraq are witnessing firsthand the celebration phenomenon.I don't expect to see such celebrations much reported in the MSM, and I do hope it's covered in my local paper. My God! Via Gateway Pundit (who links Michelle Malkin's big roundup and Boll Roggio post), I see that the BBC is saying "This is stability, at last"! (I can't think of a more remarkable development than that admission.) It pains me knowing that there are a lot of people in this country who will not be happy with the election news -- as if there's something wrong with seeing democracy actually working in Iraq. What gives? Do they have something against democracy? UPDATE (12/15/05): I'm glad to see that the election turnout made the front page of today's Philadelphia Inquirer, with a large headline, spaced as follows: Turnout High, Violence |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"Do they have something against democracy?"
OK, come on now. You left out the puppies. 'Cause the left is all 'bout the puppy-hatin'.
Seriously, though: this _is_ good news for Iraq. Full stop.