|
|
|
|
October 05, 2005
Horror story from China
If you like dogs as I do, and you thought it was bad to see dogs being shot in New Orleans, what Chinese authorities are doing makes that look humane by comparison: The start of the Chinese Year of the Dog is just four months away, but in the southern city of Guangzhou thousands of frightened dog owners and their pets are lying doggo after local authorities intensified a crackdown on unregistered animals.(From Peking Duck -- who notes the dogs are being clubbed to death -- and The English Guy, via Lynn of A Sweet, Familiar Dissonance, formerly Reflections in D minor.) No wonder the Chinese authorities have censored bloggers, and corrupted Google. Bloody bastards. MORE: People believing in things like government "registration" might keep in mind that in China, registration of dogs is synonymous with prohibition: .... dog registration fees are so high in Guangzhou that only 800 of the estimated 60,000 dogs in the city are licensed. It costs the equivalent of £700 to register a dog, almost half the average salary of most Chinese, followed by a further annual fee of about £400.Half a year's salary? Maybe I shouldn't be giving the Brady Bunch any more crackpot ideas.... posted by Eric on 10.05.05 at 11:41 AM
Comments
That is a horrifying story, especially the fact that they're doing it to prisoners apparently while they're still alive. Cruelty to animals seems to go hand in hand with cruelty to humans, of course, and as many forensics psychologists have observed, the former often leads to the latter. Eric Scheie · October 5, 2005 01:36 PM Reminds me of the Nazis making lampshades out of human skin, soap out of human fat. Tell me again why we should ever have recognized Communist China? It would make them more liberal? Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · October 5, 2005 06:20 PM Well, it might not have made them liberal, but they have transformed the government from Communism into Fascism calling itself "Communism." In a way it's too bad the Communists were smart enough to change. Eric Scheie · October 7, 2005 05:41 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
As appalling as this is for any lover of animals (even us meat-eaters) it is absolutely consistent with the behavior of a government that harvests the SKIN of freshly executed convicts, to be processed to extract the collagens to be sold to Western Cosmetics Manufacturers.
I know that sounds bizarre, but only to us protected softies in the West. Here are the links to check, taken from my own blog post: “Joe Katzman at windsofchange.net, by way of USMC_Vet, directed our scrutiny to a news item that, if you still have a stomach that can turn, will turn your stomach... ”
The central problem is that the government of China regards its citizens as property of the state, so any new rule can be justified by the its utility to the state. If profits can be made by processing human cadavers to sell those products to the West, it is clearly in the interest of the state to extend the range of crimes punishable by death. Pets represent a drain on the resources of the state, so destroying them is clearly advantageous to the state. The added benefit of the killing, especially if it is performed brutally and publicly, is the further intimidation of the citizens, to remind them of exactly who is in charge.