|
August 19, 2005
The Hitler-Churchill axis
While I'm on the subject of apologizing for crimes committed in the past, here's another meme making the rounds: the United States as the inspiration for Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. As God commanded in Deuteronomy, Americans destroyed sacred Indian poles and shrines and Germans destroyed sacred Jewish books and temples. If Aryan Americans had conquered a continent, Hitler would use the same techniques to conquer a world.Exactly the same as the Holocaust. Wounded Knee = Auschwitz. When you've seen one Holocaust, you've seen 'em all. Naturally, these historians link liberally to each other, and drag in as many respected authors as possible: David Stannard eloquently summed up the Holocaust's origins in his book American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World:Elie Wiesel is right: the road to Auschwitz was being paved in the earliest days of Christendom. But another conclusion now is equally evident: on the way to Auschwitz the road's pathway led straight through the heart of the Indies and of North and South America. Nowadays, our genocidal policies are a bit more covert and closety, but the "little Eichmanns" are everywhere at work -- even at your local shopping mall: Since the extremes of the American and German holocausts, Western civilization has pulled back some. Our leaders have decided physical conquest is bad—disposing bodies requires too much paperwork, perhaps—but economic conquest is another matter. To build our factories and shopping malls, we exploit the world's poor people, suck up their natural resources, and demolish the earth's environment.Jeez. I'm feeling so overwhelmed by guilt right now that I just don't know what to do. We more than deserve the severest possible punishment. 9/11 was a mere trifle considering the magnitude of our crimes against humanity. If only a righteously indignant oppressed group could really do something to get our attention! At any rate, Hitler might as well still be in charge of the evil Amerikkka that inspired him (and vice versa). The meta-message of this Euro-American drive should be obvious by now. Hitler wasn't an aberration. He was the ultimate product of Western civilization, the über-American. We have met the enemy, and he was us.And we must therefore wage war against the enemy -- which of course is us! There's more there, and at other similar web sites, and not surprisingly, Ward Churchill is quoted liberally. A leftist scholar at Columbia University shares his insights: Scholars estimate the North American Indian population at 15 million at the time of Columbus's arrival. In 1900, the US census found that there were 237,000 Indians in North America. This dwarves anything that Hitler ever did. What is interesting about the American architects of genocide is that they don't even feel the need to use euphemisms. They openly called for the "extermination" of the Indian, while nobody can find a single statement by Hitler that is so blunt.Yes, the United States is incredibly guilty. Not only did we inspire Hitler, but we've claimed his mantle forever into the future. E Pluribus Fuhrer! posted by Eric on 08.19.05 at 10:25 AM
Comments
It's an odd formulation--if you have a dark past, you can have nothing but a dark present and future. There is no redemption. Where does that leave humanity? What country, what people (including the indians) doesn't have a dark past? Mores and values change. One of the more annoying aspects of liberals is the insistence that the values they have right now are the correct ones and that it's fair to hold everyone throughout history to the ideals of todays liberals. How do they square that with another of their claims--that values are relative and you can't judge a culture by its values? byrd · August 19, 2005 02:03 PM I should have said not "if you have a dark past," but rather "if you have a dark event or dark episode in your past." At least if you're America. I'm sure they don't think Germans are forever damned for the Holocaust. byrd · August 19, 2005 02:05 PM No, because the Germans have been "redeemed" in their eyes by turning to socialism (minus the national so far) and hating themselves almost as Aristomedes · August 19, 2005 05:43 PM Nonsense! The obvious precursor is Rome's treatment of Carthaginians! Or maybe the Greek's treatment of Troy! Or... John Anderson · August 19, 2005 07:22 PM America is not the root of all evil, covetousness is. Carthaginian covetousness of Roman shipping, Roman covetousness of looted Carthaginian wealth, NAZI covetousness of everybody’s everything, Communist covetous of middle class property and last but not least American corporate covetousness of limitless profits to be gained from exploiting other nations’ cheap labor, natural resources and lack of representative government. Liberals are as prone to covetousness as the most avaricious corporate capitalist; they just prefer to use the authority of the state to coerce the taxpayer into funding their agendas rather than exploiting the wage earner at their place of labor. Now that Liberals are out of power, they covet that too. America is not an inherently benign force in the universe. It is a human endeavor and as such is fundamentally flawed. It is intellectually dishonest to make the United States a whipping boy for all historic injustice, neither is it sufficient to absolve it of sin by pronouncing its relative virtue compared to Hitler or Stalin. If the Liberals are hypocritical to judge America by an unattainable absolute standard and everyone else by permissive relativism, then what are absolutist Conservatives when they dismiss American culpability with relativistic arguments? America haters are indeed infuriating with their knee-jerk chauvinism, but so are jingoistic nationalists who deflect all criticism by citing the historic atrocities of other misguided ideologs, who incidentally were prone to using the same ends justifies the means types of rhetoric. Libertas · August 20, 2005 01:53 AM Over a 400 year period Europeans worked to reduce a population of 15 million to about 400 thousand. Where did we get the resources? Where did we find the time? Slaughtering people is work. It's a wonder we got to where we are now. And note the amount of time. The Germans (and allies and collaborators) took just 12 years to kill 6 million Jews. Even if you take the claim seriously, compared to the Nazis we were pikers. Whereto Ward Churchill: If you go back far enough in time and geography Ward does have a common ancestor with most American Indians. Then again, if you go back far enough in time and geography I have a common ancestor with most American Indians. Don't make me a Cherokee. Then again, given the Cherokees' historic eagerness to assimilate everybody they met ("Yea, we'll take the Irish.") it shouldn't be that hard for me to join one of the tribes, if I really wanted to. Alan Kellogg · August 20, 2005 06:19 AM A major problem with the genocide charge is that the proponents consider victims of disease to be victims of genocide. Accurate population statistics of the pre-colonial period are almost impossible to obtain. There's also a problem with lumping Mexican, Caribbean, and Central American populations together with North American Indians. Millions were wiped out by diseases carried by Spanish colonialists -- long before the British set foot in the hemisphere. This is not to say there weren't many atrocities as well as what would be considered war crimes today. What bothers me the most about revisionists is the attempt to portray Native Americans as pacifist nature lovers who learned violence from the invaders. The Aztecs alone sacrificed 20,000 victims a year (many of whom were eaten): http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/aztecs/sacrifice.htm Lots of gory detail here: http://www.heretical.com/cannibal/mamerica.html Reading about such things as 14,000 being sacrificed in a single event, and over 100,000 skulls counted in one place -- you'd think it would matter, but it all seems to depend on who does the killing. Eric Scheie · August 20, 2005 09:13 AM Hmm. I might— just might— buy the idea that the prison camp Andersonville in the American Civil War was an (AN) inspiration for concentration camps. However, I believe that the slaughter of the Armenians was the proximate inspiration for Hitler as he stated on more than one occasion that, as nobody remembered the Armenians, no one would remember the Jews. Dean Esmay has a number of great links on the Armenian genocide. At any rate, inspiration?"made them do it." Did the Beatles make Charles Manson? Someone who is crazy will take inspiration from any source. When do we blame Leonardo daVinci for Blackhawk Down? I think Pratchett put it best when he claimed that all trouble stems from thinking of people as things. As soon as you relegate someone to thinghood, all manner of horrible acts are possible... B. Durbin · August 20, 2005 03:26 PM I have read that the first "concentration camps", called by that name, were erected by the British in the Boer War (which Chesterton opposed -- not becuase the British were wrong to fight, bur because the Boers were right to fight). Extremely interesting about the Aztecs. Spengler compared those mass human sacrifices to the "panem et circunses" of the late Roman Empire (Classical Values). Ever since I was a little boy, I have always loved the style of the Aztecs. I can certainly think of worse ways to go out than atop an Aztec pyramid. It was considered an honor to be sacrificed to their Gods. Libertas makes an interesting point. Leftists judge their own country and their own ancestors by an absolute standard (secularism, egalitarianism, progressivism) but judge non-Western and anti-western cultures relativistically and permissively. Rightists judge other cultures by absolute Western, traditionally Christian, standards, while judging their own country and their own ancestors more relatively and historically. Or, to put it another way) Rightist "chauvinism" is geographical (we living over here are superior to those living over there). Leftist "chauvinism" is temporal (we living now are superior to those living back then). Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · August 22, 2005 10:34 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
If America = the Third Reich, then anything = nothing. I prefer the philosophy that everything = something. Nazism (National Socialism) has far more in common with Communism and with totalitarian Islam, the enemies of America and Western civilization.
Our enemies, both without and within (including Communist professors), are absolutely bad, and America, the last citadel of our Western civilization, is as close to an absolute good as we have yet come in a world still darkened by the apostasy of Akhenaton.