|
August 10, 2005
Lists that make me pissed!
I'm not up to snuff on the intricacies of Geek Law, which is obviously a still emerging field. But I have a legal question which is also a philosophical and ethical question, and I don't know where to go with it, so I thought I'd start with this blog. Hopefully, there are readers better versed in cyber law than I am. For reasons which are not entirely clear to me, people with whom I disagree have placed me on email lists which send me barrages of email which is sent simultaneously to many other people on the lists. I have asked to be removed from one of these lists, not because I'm more offended by the nonsense it proffers than I am by any other nonsense, but because the HUGE graphics take up a lot of bandwidth, and threaten to fill up the limited storage capabilities my service provider gives me. My polite request was ignored, and I continue getting gigantically large emails (along with everyone else on this list). Anyway, this morning, a thought struck me as I struggled through another one of this man's logically incomprehensible diatribes. As it happens, I also get annoying emails from someone on the opposite side of the political spectrum, and I have had my struggles with them too, because a couple of the people on the list are friends, and I've occasionally been stupid enough to answer particularly egregious charges. (My answer greatly disturbed one of the list readers I DON'T know -- who demanded I take his name off the list -- a list I never started!) Anyway, I'm tired of all this "list" business, and my idea is this: am I allowed to forward each list to the other list, thereby starting an email list war? Everyone on both lists would be incredibly pissed off, but my questions are: Would this be ethical? Would it be legal? Would it invade anyone's "privacy"? Indeed, do people who find themselves on these long lists have any anticipation of privacy? posted by Eric on 08.10.05 at 09:29 AM
Comments
I guess you're right. Much as I think trolls deserve each other, there are (in theory) sincere people who managed to get themselves on these lists. Eric Scheie · August 10, 2005 11:40 AM You may still be getting emails because while one person may have taken you off his recipient list, others may still be using the "reply to all" function to older emails that have your address; which means that you'll still be getting emails as long as people reply to older messages or to the replies thereto. Raging Bee · August 10, 2005 01:21 PM Legal? Yes, seconded. Ethical? Well, if you didn't opt in, and they won't let you leave, they deserve what they get. Unless Bee is right and it's just idiots doing reply-all, in which case, just killfile the lot of them. Sigivald · August 10, 2005 06:51 PM Have your provider's email inbox forwarded to a service, if you can, like Yahoo or Excite, rather than being held on a limited space: those two do quite a bit of filtering to a spam folder which you can delete. On my Yahoo account, for example, a typical day has 14 mails in the inbox and 278 in "Bulk". John Anderson · August 10, 2005 08:16 PM I, too, hate most of the lists I'm on ('cept family). I'm on a few people's list that update me on what they post to their blogs. Ugh. If I was interested, I'd read their blog, wouldn't I? I really hate the joke pass alongs, but that's because I'm a humorless conservative. :) There's nothing you can really do, 'cept trash 'em on receipt. Mrs. du Toit · August 11, 2005 03:29 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Would it be legal? Almost certainly. I can't think of any law that would be broken.
Would it be ethical? Certainly not. The nicest thing that could be said is that you would be stooping to the level of the trolls who prefer to taunt and harass than reason.