|
June 03, 2005
Does history remain anonymous?
In the course of debating the identity of Deep Throat, there's an important point which should not be forgotten: the character was Woodward and Bernstein's creation. An anonymous identity made up by them to protect who they claim was a vital source. Thus, in logic, only Woodward and Bernstein would seem to have the intellectual right to disclose who Deep Throat is. Obviously, this presents problems for anyone claiming that Deep Throat was someone else, or that the character never existed. Suppose a blogger were to write a post based on information gleaned from someone whose identity the blogger wanted to protect, and named the character, say, "Rove Wade." Unless someone else independently confirmed the identity of the source and disclosed it, only that blogger would seem to have the right to tell the world who the mysterious "Rove Wade" actually was. If the blogger did, however, does that mean that he would necessarily be telling the truth? After all, anyone can say anything. And suppose the blogger had assigned to the character certain specific traits that might fit any number of people, but which also ruled out certain people who did not fit the profile. Suppose further that he'd repeatedly insisted (as Woodward did) that this profile was true. If he later identified someone who didn't fit the profile (and who had repeatedly denied being the person) as that person anyway, how much credibility would that blogger have? Couldn't he expect that others might seek to verify his claims? Then there's the difference between "anonymous" and "fictional." I don't mean to use these terms interchangeably, but if a blogger assigned a name and a description to a fictional source, that would no more create an "anonymous" source than Janet Cooke's "Jimmy" character created a real person. Of course, it wouldn't much matter much if a lowly blogger did stuff like that with his own anonymous -- or fictionalized -- character. He might lose credibility, but few people would care. With Deep Throat, though, an anonymous and/or fictional character became an accepted part (albeit an unproved, legendary part) of American history. In one fell swoop, we are being told to believe that the loss of anonymity eliminates any possibility of fiction -- previous indicators of fiction notwithstanding. The identification of Deep Throat thus proposes a change in history. Mark Felt being a real person, he either was the source described as Deep Throat or he was not. This means that all of Deep Throat's (and Mark Felt's) details become fair game -- for historians, bloggers, or anyone else. Whether or not Mark Felt is indeed the legendary "Deep Throat," the end of his anonymity (assuming that's what this is) doesn't end historical inquiry. Or skepticism. posted by Eric on 06.03.05 at 12:34 PM
Comments
I like urgent piles. But surely you didn't mean to leave out Michael Jackson? Eric Scheie · June 3, 2005 03:25 PM Actually, I did. The less said about that sad disgusting old Peter-Pan-wannabee the better. Raging Bee · June 3, 2005 05:05 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
This means that all of Deep Throat's (and Mark Felt's) details become fair game -- for historians, bloggers, or anyone else.
Yeah, yeah, throw it on the "urgent" pile, we'll get to it soon as we're done finding those Iraqi WMDs, the Saddam-Osama link, proof of the validity of "intelligent design," proof that abstinence-only sex-ed works, and some backup for this new "pot causes psychosis" theory...