|
March 29, 2005
Victory from the jaws of death
Here's Andrew Sullivan on the Schiavo case: It's been striking lately how the rhetoric of some conservatives has morphed into revolutionary tones. Bill Kristol, at heart an ally of religious radicalism, calls for a revolution against the independent judiciary we now have. Fox News' John Gibson has argued that "the temple of the law is not so sacrosanct that an occasional chief executive cannot flaunt it once in a while." Bill Bennett has said that the courts are not the ultimate means to interpret law and the constitution, that the people, with rights vested in the Declaration of Independence, have a right to over-turn the courts if judges violate natural law precepts such as the right to life. Beneath all this is a struggle between conservatives who place their faith in the formalities of constitutionalism and those who place their literal faith in the God-revealed truths they believe are enshrined in the Declaration, truths that alone give meaning, in their eyes, to America as a political project.Andrew Sullivan also links to this discussion of the tension which some conservatives argue exists between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. (An argument I believe nonsensical, which I have treated irreverently.) What interests me as a political pragmatist is that the Republicans may be spelling their defeat in 2008 -- much to the advantage of Hillary Clinton, who is all but certain to be the nominee. As Sullivan argues elsewhere: For others, the Schiavo case is a first battle to win over the religious right primary voters who will determine the next Republican nominee. The Republican leadership is gambling that the intensity of their religious base will outweigh the more general public's disdain for this exercise in government over-reach. The broader public, they calculate, will forget. The zealots will always remember. And if Schiavo dies, they will have a martyr as well. And they will figuratively prop her up as a symbol in the campaigns to come.The religious right primary voters will determine the next Republican nominee? But I thought that was precisely what Hillary Clinton wanted! Anyway, the Republicans are right that as a general rule, the attention span of the American public is very short. But I think there's something about death which tends to make it the exception to this general rule. Most people spend their lives in mortal fear of death. And regardless of the merits of the Schiavo matter (as I've said, I don't think her tube should have been pulled) the fact is that Big Government has poked its nose into one family's struggle with death. This is likely to be remembered, and exploited. And exploited. (No matter what I say, please remember that these doomsday scenarios need not happen. My hat's off to Bill Quick and Jon Henke for thinking ahead. And need I mention Glenn Reynolds?) UPDATE: Just this morning, I see that Michael Schiavo is requesting an autopsy, contrary to earlier reports. Is someone thinking about 2008? MORE: A lot of bloggers are debating whether the religious right has gone too far this time. InstaPundit links to a fascinating debate between Jeff Jarvis (who's great, and who links to this excellent analysis by Joe Gandelman) and Hugh Hewitt, who articulates the conservative position better than anyone else, and makes a good point about avoiding stereotypes. The problem is that I find myself agreeing with much of what both Jarvis and Hewitt say, which prevents me from declaring either a "winner." But my truest sentiments are with The Anchoress: Randall Terry and his zealots full of certainty and moral superiority are now coming off like their unbearable counterparts on the left. Their rhetoric is becoming the equivalent of "America is a horrible country because Bushitler is killing people in Iraq!"And I still think that when the dust settles, ordinary voters will tend to remember this as Big Government trying to butt in. And Glenn Reynolds is absolutely right about Randall Terry: ....[H]e needs to be loudly and regularly denounced as a nut. Otherwise you're in the same boat as lefties who don't want to be identified with Ward Churchill, but happily use him when they want to draw a crowd.(Of course, considering that Churchill is working for Karl Rove, can Hillary really be faulted for hiring Terry?) STILL MORE: Jesse Jackson has arrived on the scene. (Wouldn't want to have a circus atmosphere develop....) AND MORE (03/30/05): Nat Hentoff's Schiavo piece in today's Village Voice is an awfully good read, and provides food for thought to people who'd probably otherwise never hear it: Months ago, in discussing this case with ACLU executive director Anthony Romero, and later reading ACLU statements, I saw no sign that this bastion of the Bill of Rights has ever examined the facts concerning the egregious conflicts of interest of her husband and guardian Michael Schiavo, who has been living with another woman for years, with whom he has two children, and has violated a long list of his legal responsibilities as her guardian, some of them directly preventing her chances for improvement. Judge Greer has ignored all of them.There's more, and while I know everyone's tired of reading about the Schiavo case, seeing Nat Hentoff accused of "wingnuttery" -- by the same people who've just honored Kim du Toit with this breathtakingly ingenious exercise in academic wit -- made me feel obliged. MORE: John Hawkins' Schiavo FAQ is well worth reading too. UPDATE (03/31/05): While it's probably too late to write an update that few will see, I feel obligated to make an exception here, because just as I realized that I'd forgotten to credit Glenn Reynolds for that link to Right Wing News's Schiavo FAQ, I read this: ...[T]he entire "libertarian" culture []... is astutely ignoring the actual facts of Terri's case, preferring to argue peripheral issues instead. InstaPundit happens to embody that culture to a tee, unfortunately.Sigh. I guess that mean that I am not part of the "libertarian" "culture" -- because I haven't ignored the facts. Has Glenn Reynolds? I must ask: why would the "fact-ignoring" Glenn Reynolds bother with the RightWingNews link? FINAL NOTE: Considering that apparently sane people are still defending Randall Terry, this quote is well worth remembering: "Let a wave of intolerance wash over you. I want you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good.... If a Christian voted for Clinton, he sinned against God. It's that simple.... Our goal is a Christian Nation... we have a biblical duty, we are called by God to conquer this country. We don't want equal time. We don't want Pluralism. We want theocracy. Theocracy means God rules. I've got a hot flash. God rules."If this raging loony tune isn't a theocrat, then who is? posted by Eric on 03.29.05 at 08:59 AM
Comments
Not in the case of Randall Terry and Jesse Jackson..... Eric Scheie · March 29, 2005 09:42 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"Most people spend their lives in mortal fear of death."
That seems a bit dangerous, now, doesn't it? :) I think that death is still second to public speaking, though.